Back to News
quantum-computing

Threshold Behavior of ZX and ZY Surface Codes Under Circuit-Level Biased and Crosstalk Noise

Pritesh Thakur, Jean-Fran\c{c}ois Van Huele
Loading...
4 min read
0 likes
⚡ Quantum Brief
(2018), using an optimal tensor-network decoder, demonstrated that replacing $Z$-type stabilizers with $Y$-type stabilizers significantly improves the surface code threshold under code-capacity level dephasing noise. We compare it with the standard $ZX$ surface code under circuit-level Pauli-$X$ biased noise, with and without an additional gate-based $XX$ crosstalk noise. We find that for the $ZX$ surface code, the $X$-memory threshold increases monotonically with bias while the $Z$-memory threshold decreases and saturates. Adding $XX$ crosstalk reduces the $Z$-memory threshold beyond the fitting uncertainty while leaving the $X$ memory threshold largely unaffected.
AI Audio Summary
0:00 / 0:00
Click to play
page-006-object-005.webp
Quantum News · Media Library

Quantum Physics arXiv:2609.10876 (quant-ph) [Submitted on 9 Sep 2026] Title:Threshold Behavior of ZX and ZY Surface Codes Under Circuit-Level Biased and Crosstalk Noise Authors:Pritesh Thakur, Jean-François Van Huele View a PDF of the paper titled Threshold Behavior of ZX and ZY Surface Codes Under Circuit-Level Biased and Crosstalk Noise, by Pritesh Thakur and 1 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Studying the threshold behavior of surface codes under biased noise models is an active area of research. Previous work Tuckett et al. (2018), using an optimal tensor-network decoder, demonstrated that replacing $Z$-type stabilizers with $Y$-type stabilizers significantly improves the surface code threshold under code-capacity level dephasing noise. In this work, we construct and study a $ZY$ surface code by replacing the $X$-type stabilizers with $Y$-type stabilizers. We compare it with the standard $ZX$ surface code under circuit-level Pauli-$X$ biased noise, with and without an additional gate-based $XX$ crosstalk noise. We find that for the $ZX$ surface code, the $X$-memory threshold increases monotonically with bias while the $Z$-memory threshold decreases and saturates. For the $ZY$ surface code, the $Y$-memory threshold is nearly constant across all bias values. The $Z$-memory thresholds of the $ZX$ and $ZY$ codes are consistent within the uncertainty. Adding $XX$ crosstalk reduces the $Z$-memory threshold beyond the fitting uncertainty while leaving the $X$ memory threshold largely unaffected. The choice of CNOT ordering redistributes threshold performance between the two logical memories. Our work extends prior observations from code-capacity level noise to circuit-level noise. It also indicates the need for decoders capable of jointly reasoning over correlated syndrome information so that tailored stabilizer structures could be fully utilized for quantum error correction. Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph) Cite as: arXiv:2609.10876 [quant-ph] (or arXiv:2609.10876v1 [quant-ph] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.10876 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Pritesh Thakur [view email] [v1] Wed, 9 Sep 2026 22:34:27 UTC (13,344 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Threshold Behavior of ZX and ZY Surface Codes Under Circuit-Level Biased and Crosstalk Noise, by Pritesh Thakur and 1 other authorsView PDFHTML (experimental)TeX Source view license Current browse context: quant-ph new | recent | 2026-09 References & Citations INSPIRE HEP NASA ADSGoogle Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Read Original

Tags

quantum-error-correction

Source Information

Source: arXiv Quantum Physics

Discussion

0 professional contributions

Sign in to join this professional discussion.

Be the first to add a constructive contribution.