The Future of Quantum Computing

Breaking news, scored company profiles, and ecosystem intelligence across the global quantum sector — plus the deepest coverage of India's National Quantum Mission.

Where Will Rigetti Computing Stock Be in 3 Years?
Featured Story

Where Will Rigetti Computing Stock Be in 3 Years?

While quantum computing doesn't yet have widespread practical applications, the technologies involved with it are improving. Artificial intelligence (AI) is widely believed to help accelerate quantum computing's applications, providing even more fuel to this tech fire. The result is that many pure-play quantum computing stocks, including Rigetti Computing (RGTI +0.13%), have seen their share prices surge over the past three years, with Rigetti's rising 718%. So, where will the company be in three more years, and can it replicate its past share price success? While I think Rigetti will likely expand its quantum computing sales and gain more customers, recreating its past returns will be very difficult. Here's why. Image source: Getty Images. Where Rigetti could be in three years While Rigetti's revenue is increasing and it's gaining some commercial customers, the company still needs to achieve more technological advancements before it sees meaningful sales. CEO Subodh Kulkarni said recently that "commercial revenue remains early" and that, "We remain focused on a clear sequence designed to position Rigetti to reach quantum advantage in roughly three years." That's an important timeline for Rigetti because commercial sales will likely remain limited before then, and it helps put the company's current revenue into perspective. Sales rose by 185% in the second quarter, but that impressive jump still resulted in just over $5.1 million in revenue. That's hardly an impressive figure, and it shows why Rigetti's management has tried to temper expectations. But Rigetti is making progress with its quantum computing technologies, and in three years, it will likely have more customers and contracts than it does now. For example, the company said it expanded its collaboration with Hewlett Packard and the Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center to develop a hybrid quantum-classical supercomputer. Rigetti also recently signed a letter of intent with the U.S. Department of Commerce for up

Sep 6, 2026

Featured Stories

View All Stories
Quantum Measurement, How Reading a Qubit Worksquantum-computing

Quantum Measurement, How Reading a Qubit Works

Quantum measurement is the act of pulling a definite, classical answer out of a quantum state, which sounds simple enough until you look at what it costs. It is where quantum mechanics is at its strangest, because the act of looking changes the thing you are looking at and forces a random outcome. Every quantum computation ends in a measurement, and on real hardware that read is a specification in its own right, with its own speed and its own error rate.Measurement is an active event that destroys information, not a passive reading. One rule, named after Max Born, turns the quantum state’s amplitudes into the odds of each outcome, and everything else about reading a qubit follows from it. The act is irreversible. It takes many repetitions to learn anything about an unknown state, and it needs no conscious observer, only a detector that ends up correlated with the qubit.Key TakeawaysIt extracts a classical answer. A measurement maps a quantum state to a single classical outcome plus a changed state, turning quantum information into ordinary bits.The Born rule sets the odds. The probability of each outcome is the squared magnitude of its amplitude, the bridge from quantum states to observed results.You choose what to measure. The same state gives different results depending on which observable you decide to measure, so there is no single privileged measurement.It cannot be undone. Unlike a reversible gate, a measurement discards the part of the state that disagrees with the outcome, making it the one irreversible step in a circuit.One shot gives one number. Learning an unknown state takes many identically prepared copies, and the statistical error falls only as the square root of the number of runs.No observer is required. Any sufficiently strong interaction with a detector or the environment counts, so consciousness plays no role.On This PageA definite value only in one set of special statesThe Born rule squares an amplitude to get a probabilityThe number you read is

Quantum ZeitgeistLoading...0
The Steane Code Explainedquantum-computing

The Steane Code Explained

The Steane code is the seven-qubit error-correcting code that shows how classical coding theory becomes quantum, with seven physical qubits standing guard over one logical qubit. It corrects any single error on any one of them. The trick is to take a classical code from 1950 and use it twice over, once for each of the two ways a qubit can fail. That double use makes it the smallest clean example of the CSS construction, the recipe that turns classical codes into quantum ones. Two ideas central to fault tolerance start here. One is the transversal gate, which applies a single operation to each qubit separately so that a faulty component leaves one error rather than several. The other is the T gate, whose cost is the largest item in most published resource estimates. Introduced by Andrew Steane, 1996 Parameters [[7,1,3]], seven physical qubits, one logical qubit, distance three Corrects Any single-qubit error, whether a bit flip, a phase flip, or both Type A CSS code that contains its own dual, built from the classical [7,4,3] Hamming code Also known as The distance-three colour code, its geometric equivalent Transversal gates The full Clifford group, Hadamard and phase within a block, CNOT between blocks Key takeaways Seven qubits protect one, with distance three. That is written [[7,1,3]], and distance three means any single error is detected and corrected. It is one classical Hamming code doing two jobs. The [7,4,3] Hamming code catches bit flips in one basis and phase flips in the other, and it contains its own dual, which is what lets the two sets of checks run without interfering. It is the smallest clean CSS code. The Calderbank-Shor-Steane recipe builds quantum codes from classical ones, and the Steane code is its most-taught example. Its Clifford gates are transversal. Hadamard and phase are applied qubit by qubit with no interaction, so a single fault stays a single error, which is what makes the code fault tolerant. The T gate is the catch. Clifford gates a

Quantum ZeitgeistLoading...0

From Quantum Authors

View Guest Articles

Trending Stories

View All Trending
Quantum News

Get the Quantum News Newsletter

Weekly insights • No spam • Unsubscribe anytime

India National Quantum Mission

Explore India's ₹6,003 Crore quantum initiative: 4 thematic hubs, leading startups, and the latest developments in India's quantum ecosystem

View All India NQM Content