Back to News
quantum-computing

Storage, Scrambling, and Loss of Information in the Quantum Reservoir Computing Paradigm

Nathan Keenan, Roberta Zambrini
Loading...
3 min read
0 likes
⚡ Quantum Brief
Researchers Nathan Keenan and Roberta Zambrini introduced a classical-quantum state derived from the process tensor to analyze quantum reservoir computing (QRC) platforms. Their framework quantifies information saturation, fading memory of past inputs, and local accessibility of injected data using Holevo quantities. By numerically investigating these properties in a common QRC setup, they extracted two diagnostics to characterize nonlocal information scrambling and loss within the substrate. The study also compared these metrics to QRC performance across varying Hamiltonian parameters and measurement strengths, offering new tools to optimize and extend QRC applications.
Why it matters

This work provides a quantitative framework to assess how quantum reservoirs store, scramble, and lose information, directly linking dynamical properties to task performance. It enables targeted improvements in QRC design and reveals fundamental limits in time-series processing.

AI Audio Summary
0:00 / 0:00
Click to play
figure-06.webp
Quantum News · Media Library

Quantum Physics arXiv:2608.07677 (quant-ph) [Submitted on 7 Aug 2026] Title:Storage, Scrambling, and Loss of Information in the Quantum Reservoir Computing Paradigm Authors:Nathan Keenan, Roberta Zambrini View a PDF of the paper titled Storage, Scrambling, and Loss of Information in the Quantum Reservoir Computing Paradigm, by Nathan Keenan and 1 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:The suitability of a quantum reservoir computing (QRC) platform for a given time-series processing task is closely tied to the dynamical properties of its computational substrate and design. Information is injected into, processed by, and read from this substrate, and finally passed to a linear readout layer which is trained to perform a specific task. In this work we introduce a classical-quantum state derived from the process tensor representing the dynamical part of this process for typical QRC protocols found in the literature. Using this object, mutual informations between physical subsystems and subsets of past inputs can be written as Holevo quantities, which we then use to numerically investigate information saturation in the substrate, fading memory of past inputs, and the local accessibility of injected information for a commonly used QRC platform. We then extract two diagnostics that characterise the nonlocal scrambling of information within, and loss of information from the substrate, and compare these to QRC performance across Hamiltonian parameters and measurement strengths. Finally, we comment on future directions that the framework introduced here opens up for the study and extension of the QRC program. Comments: Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph) Cite as: arXiv:2608.07677 [quant-ph] (or arXiv:2608.07677v1 [quant-ph] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.07677 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Nathan Keenan [view email] [v1] Fri, 7 Aug 2026 18:02:55 UTC (3,630 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Storage, Scrambling, and Loss of Information in the Quantum Reservoir Computing Paradigm, by Nathan Keenan and 1 other authorsView PDFHTML (experimental)TeX Source view license Current browse context: quant-ph new | recent | 2026-08 References & Citations INSPIRE HEP NASA ADSGoogle Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Read Original

Source Information

Source: arXiv Quantum Physics

Discussion

0 professional contributions

Sign in to join this professional discussion.

Be the first to add a constructive contribution.