Shots-to-Approximate-Solution Scaling in Neutral-Atom Quantum Optimization

Understand this faster with AI
Quantum Physics arXiv:2608.12858 (quant-ph) [Submitted on 13 Aug 2026] Title:Shots-to-Approximate-Solution Scaling in Neutral-Atom Quantum Optimization Authors:Junwoo Jung, Jaewook Ahn View a PDF of the paper titled Shots-to-Approximate-Solution Scaling in Neutral-Atom Quantum Optimization, by Junwoo Jung and Jaewook Ahn View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Whether neutral-atom quantum optimization protocols exhibit genuine concentration toward low-energy solution structure remains an open question. Here, we introduce a shots-to-approximate-solution metric, STS(r), where r denotes the approximation ratio, and evaluate it using postprocessed outputs modeled by a degeneracy-weighted shell distribution governed by a single effective parameter, $\beta$, that quantifies concentration toward near-optimal independent sets. To extract the genuine concentration effect in the quantum data, we apply identical postprocessing to both experimental bitstrings and randomly generated bitstrings with matched excitation density, thereby constructing an excitation-matched random baseline. Experiments on programmable Rydberg-atom arrays with system sizes up to 125 sites show that quantum annealing consistently exceeds the random baseline, demonstrating enhanced concentration toward low-energy solution structure beyond what can be attributed solely to excitation density. The results further reveal two distinct target-dependent regimes. For near-exact targets with $r \approx 1$, the required shot count grows exponentially with system size and is reduced at the same exponential level by quantum annealing within the shell-model description. By contrast, for relaxed targets, the shot cost becomes effectively constant, and the corresponding quantum enhancement diminishes, with the classical postprocessing heuristic alone reaching the target in order-unity attempts. Together, these results establish an operational method for quantifying quantum optimization performance and clarify the regimes under which quantum approaches can yield practical benefits. Comments: Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph); Atomic Physics (physics.atom-ph) Cite as: arXiv:2608.12858 [quant-ph] (or arXiv:2608.12858v1 [quant-ph] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.12858 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Junwoo Jung [view email] [v1] Thu, 13 Aug 2026 06:00:08 UTC (745 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Shots-to-Approximate-Solution Scaling in Neutral-Atom Quantum Optimization, by Junwoo Jung and Jaewook AhnView PDFHTML (experimental)TeX Source view license Current browse context: quant-ph new | recent | 2026-08 Change to browse by: physics physics.atom-ph References & Citations INSPIRE HEP NASA ADSGoogle Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
Tags
Source Information
Discussion
0 professional contributions
Sign in to join this professional discussion.
Be the first to add a constructive contribution.
