Back to News
quantum-computing

Scaling vs entanglement in measurement-induced phase transition for non-integrable systems

Paranjoy Chaki, Protyush Nandi, Subinay Dasgupta, Ujjwal Sen
Loading...
3 min read
0 likes
⚡ Quantum Brief
Finite-size scaling reveals a pronounced initial state dependence: for the polarized product state, the transition point follows an inverse-square-root scaling with system size in both non-integrable models, consistent with the integrable TFIM, whereas for the GHZ initial state, it deviates from this scaling and approaches zero considerably more slowly in the non-integrable models than in the integrable TFIM. We show that both the survival probability and the bipartite entanglement entropy consistently capture a transition between area-law and volume-law entangled phases for two distinct initial states: a product state with all spins polarized along the transverse direction and a Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger (GHZ) state.
AI Audio Summary
0:00 / 0:00
Click to play
figure-21.webp
Quantum News · Media Library

Quantum Physics arXiv:2608.21578 (quant-ph) [Submitted on 21 Aug 2026] Title:Scaling vs entanglement in measurement-induced phase transition for non-integrable systems Authors:Paranjoy Chaki, Protyush Nandi, Subinay Dasgupta, Ujjwal Sen View a PDF of the paper titled Scaling vs entanglement in measurement-induced phase transition for non-integrable systems, by Paranjoy Chaki and 3 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:We find that the measurement-induced phase transition generated by deterministic global measurements, previously observed in the integrable transverse-field Ising model (TFIM), persists in non-integrable variants of the same. To address this question, we consider the TFIM with longitudinal field and the axial next-nearest-neighbor Ising (ANNNI) model. We show that both the survival probability and the bipartite entanglement entropy consistently capture a transition between area-law and volume-law entangled phases for two distinct initial states: a product state with all spins polarized along the transverse direction and a Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger (GHZ) state. Finite-size scaling reveals a pronounced initial state dependence: for the polarized product state, the transition point follows an inverse-square-root scaling with system size in both non-integrable models, consistent with the integrable TFIM, whereas for the GHZ initial state, it deviates from this scaling and approaches zero considerably more slowly in the non-integrable models than in the integrable TFIM. These results establish the robustness of measurement-induced transitions under deterministic measurements against integrability breaking while highlighting the crucial role of the initial state in governing their scaling behavior. Comments: Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph); Statistical Mechanics (cond-mat.stat-mech) Cite as: arXiv:2608.21578 [quant-ph] (or arXiv:2608.21578v1 [quant-ph] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.21578 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Paranjoy Chaki [view email] [v1] Fri, 21 Aug 2026 19:29:19 UTC (194 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Scaling vs entanglement in measurement-induced phase transition for non-integrable systems, by Paranjoy Chaki and 3 other authorsView PDFHTML (experimental)TeX Source view license Current browse context: quant-ph new | recent | 2026-08 Change to browse by: cond-mat cond-mat.stat-mech References & Citations INSPIRE HEP NASA ADSGoogle Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Read Original

Tags

quantum-annealing

Source Information

Source: arXiv Quantum Physics

Discussion

0 professional contributions

Sign in to join this professional discussion.

Be the first to add a constructive contribution.