Back to News
quantum-computing

Reliable Sample-Level Quantum Error Mitigation via Dominance-Aware Clustering

Mohsen Ghodrati, Kausthubh Chandramouli, Dror Baron
Loading...
3 min read
0 likes
⚡ Quantum Brief
Researchers Mohsen Ghodrati, Kausthubh Chandramouli, and Dror Baron introduced a new quantum error mitigation method called dominance-aware clustering. Their approach targets sample-level recovery in quantum algorithms, where measured probability mass clusters around latent bitstrings. By identifying dominance—a condition where over half of a region’s probability mass aligns with a single source—they enable majority voting to recover centers with exponentially decreasing error. The team also developed a refinement technique combining responsibility thresholding and local dominance screening to address failures in nearest-center assignment, such as those in k-modes clustering. Tests on synthetic and simulated MaxCut-QAOA data showed improved precision and overall center recovery, all via classical post-processing without extra quantum circuit runs.
Why it matters

This method advances practical quantum optimization by reliably extracting high-quality solutions from noisy outputs, a critical step for near-term quantum advantage in tasks like MaxCut-QAOA.

AI Audio Summary
0:00 / 0:00
Click to play
page-006-object-018.webp
Quantum News · Media Library

Quantum Physics arXiv:2609.01744 (quant-ph) [Submitted on 1 Sep 2026] Title:Reliable Sample-Level Quantum Error Mitigation via Dominance-Aware Clustering Authors:Mohsen Ghodrati, Kausthubh Chandramouli, Dror Baron View a PDF of the paper titled Reliable Sample-Level Quantum Error Mitigation via Dominance-Aware Clustering, by Mohsen Ghodrati and 2 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Many quantum algorithms for classically difficult optimization tasks must return high-quality bitstrings from finitely many circuit executions, whereas most quantum error-mitigation methods target expectation values. We study sample-level recovery when measured probability mass is distributed around multiple latent bitstrings, called centers. Each component of the measured probability mass is called a source and we assume that each center is associated with one source. We identify dominance-at every coordinate, more than half of a retained region's probability mass comes from one source and agrees with its center-as a sufficient condition under which majority voting recovers that center with exponentially decreasing error probability. We show that nearest-center assignment, as used in clustering algorithms such as the $k$-modes algorithm, can fail to produce dominated regions even when the true centers are known. This failure motivates responsibility thresholding and a local dominance screen, whose combination we call dominance-aware (DA) refinement. Synthetic and simulated MaxCut-QAOA experiments show that DA refinement favors precision, while $k$-modes with DA refinement improves overall center recovery. All procedures are classical post-processing and require no additional quantum-circuit executions. Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph); Information Theory (cs.IT) Cite as: arXiv:2609.01744 [quant-ph] (or arXiv:2609.01744v1 [quant-ph] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.01744 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Kausthubh Chandramouli [view email] [v1] Tue, 1 Sep 2026 18:10:44 UTC (117 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Reliable Sample-Level Quantum Error Mitigation via Dominance-Aware Clustering, by Mohsen Ghodrati and 2 other authorsView PDFHTML (experimental)TeX Source view license Current browse context: quant-ph new | recent | 2026-09 Change to browse by: cs cs.IT math math.IT References & Citations INSPIRE HEP NASA ADSGoogle Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Read Original

Tags

quantum-optimization
quantum-algorithms
quantum-error-correction
partnership

Source Information

Source: arXiv Quantum Physics

Discussion

0 professional contributions

Sign in to join this professional discussion.

Be the first to add a constructive contribution.