Back to News
quantum-computing

Quantum Preconditioning For Constrained Optimization Problems

Anurag Ramesh, Bhuvanesh Sundar, Maxime Dupont, David E. Bernal Neira
Loading...
3 min read
0 likes
⚡ Quantum Brief
A team led by Anurag Ramesh, Bhuvanesh Sundar, Maxime Dupont, and David E. Bernal Neira demonstrated quantum preconditioning for constrained optimization, using QAOA-derived two-point correlations to refine objective functions for mixed-integer programming solvers. Their hybrid approach, tested on dense weighted complete-graph instances, retained original hard constraints while accelerating convergence to near-optimal solutions. Most gains appeared at the shallowest QAOA depth, with solver trajectories revealing earlier discovery of high-quality incumbents. The method validates a framework where quantum insights guide classical exact solvers without compromising feasibility.
Why it matters

This hybrid quantum-classical method bridges the gap between heuristic quantum speedups and exact classical solvers, offering a practical path to scale constrained optimization without sacrificing solution quality or feasibility.

AI Audio Summary
0:00 / 0:00
Click to play
Untitled design (37).png
Quantum News · Media Library

Quantum Physics arXiv:2608.28842 (quant-ph) [Submitted on 28 Aug 2026] Title:Quantum Preconditioning For Constrained Optimization Problems Authors:Anurag Ramesh, Bhuvanesh Sundar, Maxime Dupont, David E.

Bernal Neira View a PDF of the paper titled Quantum Preconditioning For Constrained Optimization Problems, by Anurag Ramesh and 2 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:We study the effect of quantum preconditioning on constrained combinatorial optimization problems, focusing on balanced graph bi-partitioning. The proposed approach uses two-point correlations between decision variables derived from the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) to construct a modified objective function that is subsequently provided to mixed-integer programming (MIP) solvers. The preconditioned MIP formulation retains the original hard constraint, and all incumbent solutions are evaluated under the original objective. Computational experiments on dense, weighted complete-graph instances show that the preconditioned problem instances reach near-optimal solutions faster, with most of the benefit already realized at the shallowest QAOA depth tested. Solver callback trajectories show this arises from earlier discovery of high-quality incumbents during the solution search. These results support a hybrid optimization framework in which quantum algorithms provide problem-specific information to guide classical exact MIP solvers. Comments: Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph) Cite as: arXiv:2608.28842 [quant-ph] (or arXiv:2608.28842v1 [quant-ph] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.28842 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Anurag Ramesh [view email] [v1] Fri, 28 Aug 2026 20:23:37 UTC (1,350 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Quantum Preconditioning For Constrained Optimization Problems, by Anurag Ramesh and 2 other authorsView PDFHTML (experimental)TeX Source view license Current browse context: quant-ph new | recent | 2026-08 References & Citations INSPIRE HEP NASA ADSGoogle Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Read Original

Tags

quantum-optimization
quantum-algorithms

Source Information

Source: arXiv Quantum Physics

Discussion

0 professional contributions

Sign in to join this professional discussion.

Be the first to add a constructive contribution.