Back to News
quantum-computing

Parallel Circuit Execution for Scalable Quantum Computation

Avimita Chatterjee, W. Michael Brown, Siyuan Niu, Wibe Albert de Jong, Thomas Lubinski
Loading...
4 min read
0 likes
⚡ Quantum Brief
Building upon prior work, we introduce an error- and topology-aware method for mapping multiple independent circuits onto disjoint regions of a single large-scale QPU for parallel circuit execution. --> Quantum Physics arXiv:2609.12172 (quant-ph) [Submitted on 10 Sep 2026] Title:Parallel Circuit Execution for Scalable Quantum Computation Authors:Avimita Chatterjee, W. We demonstrate the approach on IBM's 156-qubit ibm_boston processor using standard QED-C benchmark and Hamiltonian-based observable-estimation workloads. Using CUDA-Q on the NERSC Perlmutter system, we achieve up to 13.8x speedup on 16 GPUs (86% parallel efficiency) for an H2 electronic-structure simulation, with scaling evaluated across multiple Hamiltonians and circuit counts.
AI Audio Summary
0:00 / 0:00
Click to play
page-025-object-037.webp
Quantum News · Media Library

Quantum Physics arXiv:2609.12172 (quant-ph) [Submitted on 10 Sep 2026] Title:Parallel Circuit Execution for Scalable Quantum Computation Authors:Avimita Chatterjee, W. Michael Brown, Siyuan Niu, Wibe Albert de Jong, Thomas Lubinski View a PDF of the paper titled Parallel Circuit Execution for Scalable Quantum Computation, by Avimita Chatterjee and 3 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Today's quantum processors have tens to hundreds of physical qubits, but reliable execution of arbitrary circuits remains limited to fewer than 30 entangled qubits across hardware modalities. Building upon prior work, we introduce an error- and topology-aware method for mapping multiple independent circuits onto disjoint regions of a single large-scale QPU for parallel circuit execution. For applications with many similarly sized circuits, such as observable estimation for Hamiltonian simulation, this approach can reduce billed QPU execution time, with ideal speedup proportional to the number of usable partitions. We demonstrate the approach on IBM's 156-qubit ibm_boston processor using standard QED-C benchmark and Hamiltonian-based observable-estimation workloads. Compared with standard sequential execution, parallel execution reduces billed execution time by 3.5-5.5x while retaining 83-92% of the sequential fidelity. We further evaluate the scaling of parallel circuit execution using GPU-accelerated classical simulation, distributing measurement circuits across GPUs via MPI. Using CUDA-Q on the NERSC Perlmutter system, we achieve up to 13.8x speedup on 16 GPUs (86% parallel efficiency) for an H2 electronic-structure simulation, with scaling evaluated across multiple Hamiltonians and circuit counts. These results provide an indication of the performance ceiling that parallel execution on future quantum hardware may eventually approach. Both execution modes are implemented as a runtime option within the QED-C Application-Oriented Benchmark suite. Together, the results show that circuit-level parallelism can reduce execution cost on current quantum hardware and simulation time on GPU clusters, with the potential for greater benefits as device quality and qubit counts increase. Comments: Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph) Cite as: arXiv:2609.12172 [quant-ph] (or arXiv:2609.12172v1 [quant-ph] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.12172 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Avimita Chatterjee [view email] [v1] Thu, 10 Sep 2026 20:00:16 UTC (1,340 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Parallel Circuit Execution for Scalable Quantum Computation, by Avimita Chatterjee and 3 other authorsView PDFHTML (experimental)TeX Source view license Current browse context: quant-ph new | recent | 2026-09 References & Citations INSPIRE HEP NASA ADSGoogle Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Read Original

Tags

quantum-hardware

Source Information

Source: arXiv Quantum Physics

Discussion

0 professional contributions

Sign in to join this professional discussion.

Be the first to add a constructive contribution.