Back to News
quantum-computing

New Methods and Frameworks for Quantum State Preparation in Modern Quantum Systems

Alexis Gomez
Loading...
4 min read
0 likes
⚡ Quantum Brief
A deep-circuit n=8 run on ibm_fez shows the executed-count ordering re-emerge outside the run-to-run spread on the complex target. Both are benchmarked against ten configurations spanning the UCR, isometry, multiplexor, Schmidt/SVD, QSD, and heap-transform families. Several of those are realizations through Qiskit builders or compiler optimization, not from-scratch reimplementations. The n=3 noisy comparison spans ibm_fez, ibm_kingston, and ibm_marrakesh, three 156-qubit IBM Heron r2 processors, where single-submission nine-method jobs permit within-session family-wide Benjamini-Hochberg-corrected comparisons.
AI Audio Summary
0:00 / 0:00
Click to play
anton-maksimov-5642-su-wrkNQmhmdvY-unsplash.jpg
Quantum News · Media Library

Quantum Physics arXiv:2608.16937 (quant-ph) [Submitted on 10 Aug 2026] Title:New Methods and Frameworks for Quantum State Preparation in Modern Quantum Systems Authors:Alexis Gomez View a PDF of the paper titled New Methods and Frameworks for Quantum State Preparation in Modern Quantum Systems, by Alexis Gomez View PDF Abstract:This thesis studies exact, deterministic preparation of arbitrary dense n-qubit states, the data-loading step in quantum signal and image processing. It derives two syntheses built on the Digital Signal-induced Heap Transform (DsiHT): the QsiHT Fast Path Real Synthesis and the QsiHT Fast Path Complex Synthesis. Both are benchmarked against ten configurations spanning the UCR, isometry, multiplexor, Schmidt/SVD, QSD, and heap-transform families. Several of those are realizations through Qiskit builders or compiler optimization, not from-scratch reimplementations. The n=3 noisy comparison spans ibm_fez, ibm_kingston, and ibm_marrakesh, three 156-qubit IBM Heron r2 processors, where single-submission nine-method jobs permit within-session family-wide Benjamini-Hochberg-corrected comparisons. The frontier-versus-QSD separation reproduces within one calibration on every device, but the within-frontier order does not reproduce across devices or calibration days. A deep-circuit n=8 run on ibm_fez shows the executed-count ordering re-emerge outside the run-to-run spread on the complex target. Depth was not isolated from mapping, gate composition, calibration, or session effects. All methods are exact to machine precision and differ only in cost. Under noise the coarse error tier tracks the executed (routed) two-qubit count, separating the Theta(2^n) frontier from QSD's Theta(4^n) and nothing finer. Both syntheses realize the deployed Qiskit StatePreparation floor of 2^n-n-1 CNOTs, undercutting every other from-scratch method on the as-built CNOT axis.

The Real Synthesis serves real (sign-bearing) targets and holds the lowest classical build cost among the exact loaders at large register sizes, through one fast Walsh-Hadamard pass.

The Complex Synthesis serves arbitrary complex targets and ties Qiskit's StatePreparation for the lowest simulated sampled error. Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph) Cite as: arXiv:2608.16937 [quant-ph] (or arXiv:2608.16937v1 [quant-ph] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.16937 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Alexis Gomez [view email] [v1] Mon, 10 Aug 2026 17:32:27 UTC (247 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled New Methods and Frameworks for Quantum State Preparation in Modern Quantum Systems, by Alexis GomezView PDFTeX Source view license Current browse context: quant-ph new | recent | 2026-08 References & Citations INSPIRE HEP NASA ADSGoogle Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Read Original

Tags

quantum-programming
government-funding
quantum-hardware

Source Information

Source: arXiv Quantum Physics

Discussion

0 professional contributions

Sign in to join this professional discussion.

Be the first to add a constructive contribution.