Back to News
quantum-computing

Hardware-Aware Fermion-to-Qubit Mappings for Simulating the 2D Hubbard Model on Heavy-Hexagon Quantum Processors

Alessio Esposito, Andrea Giachero, Zolt\`an Zimbor\`as, Leonardo Banchi
Loading...
4 min read
0 likes
⚡ Quantum Brief
We show that, while the Bravyi-Kitaev mapping initially exhibits a lower Pauli weight, this advantage is eliminated once routing costs are taken into account, confirming the Bonsai mapping as the most hardware-efficient baseline transformation for this architecture. In this work we address this problem in the context of the two-dimensional Hubbard model, simulated on IBM superconducting quantum processors with heavy-hexagon connectivity. We then use the Bonsai mapping to construct the qubit Hamiltonian of the 2D spinful Fermi-Hubbard model, introducing a simulated annealing algorithm that optimizes the assignment of Majorana strings to lattice sites, reducing the cost function by nearly 50% percent.
AI Audio Summary
0:00 / 0:00
Click to play
figure-22.webp
Quantum News · Media Library

Quantum Physics arXiv:2608.25024 (quant-ph) [Submitted on 25 Aug 2026] Title:Hardware-Aware Fermion-to-Qubit Mappings for Simulating the 2D Hubbard Model on Heavy-Hexagon Quantum Processors Authors:Alessio Esposito, Andrea Giachero, Zoltàn Zimboràs, Leonardo Banchi View a PDF of the paper titled Hardware-Aware Fermion-to-Qubit Mappings for Simulating the 2D Hubbard Model on Heavy-Hexagon Quantum Processors, by Alessio Esposito and Andrea Giachero and Zolt\`an Zimbor\`as and Leonardo Banchi View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Quantum simulation of strongly correlated fermionic systems is among the most promising near- term applications of quantum computing, but its practical efficiency depends critically on the choice of fermion-to-qubit mapping and on the connectivity of the underlying hardware. In this work we address this problem in the context of the two-dimensional Hubbard model, simulated on IBM superconducting quantum processors with heavy-hexagon connectivity. We numerically benchmark the Jordan-Wigner, Bravyi-Kitaev, and Bonsai transformations, evaluating their Pauli weight and SWAP overhead across seven heavy-hexagon chips of increasing size. We show that, while the Bravyi-Kitaev mapping initially exhibits a lower Pauli weight, this advantage is eliminated once routing costs are taken into account, confirming the Bonsai mapping as the most hardware-efficient baseline transformation for this architecture. We then use the Bonsai mapping to construct the qubit Hamiltonian of the 2D spinful Fermi-Hubbard model, introducing a simulated annealing algorithm that optimizes the assignment of Majorana strings to lattice sites, reducing the cost function by nearly 50% percent. Finally, we simulate on quantum hardware the time evolution of fermionic states up to 6x6 lattices, confirming the viability of the Bonsai encoding for hardware-aware large-scale two-dimensional simulations. Comments: Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph) Cite as: arXiv:2608.25024 [quant-ph] (or arXiv:2608.25024v1 [quant-ph] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.25024 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Alessio Esposito [view email] [v1] Tue, 25 Aug 2026 18:10:49 UTC (1,818 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Hardware-Aware Fermion-to-Qubit Mappings for Simulating the 2D Hubbard Model on Heavy-Hexagon Quantum Processors, by Alessio Esposito and Andrea Giachero and Zolt\`an Zimbor\`as and Leonardo BanchiView PDFHTML (experimental)TeX Source view license Current browse context: quant-ph new | recent | 2026-08 References & Citations INSPIRE HEP NASA ADSGoogle Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Read Original

Tags

superconducting-qubits
topological-qubit
quantum-optimization
government-funding
quantum-computing
quantum-hardware
quantum-simulation

Source Information

Source: arXiv Quantum Physics

Discussion

0 professional contributions

Sign in to join this professional discussion.

Be the first to add a constructive contribution.