Back to News
quantum-computing

FTQC Can't Be Achieved With Constant Overhead

/u/sinanspd
Loading...
1 min read
0 likes
⚡ Quantum Brief
Interesting paper from UMD. They prove that we can not have one universal constant spacetime overhead that works for arbitrarily long quantum computations of arbitrary width. The more interesting result is that they show that this cost can be shared across multiple qubits. This works in the favor of algorithms like Shor but is troublesome for thing like iterative phase estimation with large amounts of qubit reuse. We knew about the overall width vs. duration vs. reliability but nevertheless I think this is a nice way to frame it.
AI Audio Summary
0:00 / 0:00
Click to play
ilya-pavlov-OqtafYT5kTw-unsplash.jpg
Quantum News · Media Library

Interesting paper from UMD. They prove that we can not have one universal constant spacetime overhead that works for arbitrarily long quantum computations of arbitrary width. The more interesting result is that they show that this cost can be shared across multiple qubits. This works in the favor of algorithms like Shor but is troublesome for thing like iterative phase estimation with large amounts of qubit reuse. We knew about the overall width vs. duration vs. reliability but nevertheless I think this is a nice way to frame it. submitted by /u/sinanspd [link] [comments]

Read Original

Tags

quantum-investment
quantum-algorithms
quantum-hardware
partnership

Source Information

Source: Reddit r/QuantumComputing (RSS)

Discussion

0 professional contributions

Sign in to join this professional discussion.

Be the first to add a constructive contribution.