Back to News
quantum-computing
FTQC Can't Be Achieved With Constant Overhead
/u/sinanspd
Loading...
1 min read
0 likes
⚡ Quantum Brief
Interesting paper from UMD. They prove that we can not have one universal constant spacetime overhead that works for arbitrarily long quantum computations of arbitrary width. The more interesting result is that they show that this cost can be shared across multiple qubits. This works in the favor of algorithms like Shor but is troublesome for thing like iterative phase estimation with large amounts of qubit reuse. We knew about the overall width vs. duration vs. reliability but nevertheless I think this is a nice way to frame it.
AI Audio Summary
0:00 / 0:00
Click to play
Quantum News · Media Library
Understand this faster with AI
Interesting paper from UMD. They prove that we can not have one universal constant spacetime overhead that works for arbitrarily long quantum computations of arbitrary width. The more interesting result is that they show that this cost can be shared across multiple qubits. This works in the favor of algorithms like Shor but is troublesome for thing like iterative phase estimation with large amounts of qubit reuse. We knew about the overall width vs. duration vs. reliability but nevertheless I think this is a nice way to frame it. submitted by /u/sinanspd [link] [comments]
Tags
quantum-investment
quantum-algorithms
quantum-hardware
partnership
Source Information
Source: Reddit r/QuantumComputing (RSS)
Discussion
0 professional contributions
Sign in to join this professional discussion.
Be the first to add a constructive contribution.
