Back to News
quantum-computing

Disentangling Expressibility, Symmetry Protection, and Hardware Noise in Variational Quantum Simulation of the Two-Flavor Schwinger Model

Karthikeya Machiraju, Krishna Sujith, Kaustav Bhowmick
Loading...
4 min read
0 likes
⚡ Quantum Brief
Following the model from N = 2 to 6 staggered lattice sites, we find that the binding constraint at reachable sizes is hardware noise rather than circuit expressibility or trainability, and identify N = 3 as the immediately viable extension of existing trapped-ion experiments. The condition is local in chemical potential: at N = 3 the layer count sufficient at zero chemical potential leaves a 74.38% error near the first-order boundary, while one further layer reaches 0.08%. Comparing a global contraction with per-gate local noise, a fixed-parameter control shows that the noise model, not whether the optimizer runs inside the noisy loop, sets how strongly noise degrades the first-order transition.
AI Audio Summary
0:00 / 0:00
Click to play
Untitled design (19).png
Quantum News · Media Library

Quantum Physics arXiv:2609.30496 (quant-ph) [Submitted on 24 Sep 2026] Title:Disentangling Expressibility, Symmetry Protection, and Hardware Noise in Variational Quantum Simulation of the Two-Flavor Schwinger Model Authors:Karthikeya Machiraju, Krishna Sujith, Kaustav Bhowmick View a PDF of the paper titled Disentangling Expressibility, Symmetry Protection, and Hardware Noise in Variational Quantum Simulation of the Two-Flavor Schwinger Model, by Karthikeya Machiraju and 2 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Existing quantum simulations of the two-flavor Schwinger model have run at a single lattice size, and it is not known how far the variational approach can be pushed or which weakness stops it first. Following the model from N = 2 to 6 staggered lattice sites, we find that the binding constraint at reachable sizes is hardware noise rather than circuit expressibility or trainability, and identify N = 3 as the immediately viable extension of existing trapped-ion experiments. The energy error of a charge-conserving ansatz collapses onto one function of p/d, the ratio of variational parameters to physical-sector dimension, and falls by more than two orders of magnitude as p/d rises through order unity, giving the expressibility condition L(4N - 1) >= binom(2N,N) for L circuit layers. The condition is local in chemical potential: at N = 3 the layer count sufficient at zero chemical potential leaves a 74.38% error near the first-order boundary, while one further layer reaches 0.08%. Charge conservation also protects trainability and prevents charge-sector leakage: as the qubit count doubles from 4 to 8, the normalized gradient variance falls to 1/3.56 of its starting value for the constrained ansatz, versus 1/13.57 for an unconstrained circuit. Comparing a global contraction with per-gate local noise, a fixed-parameter control shows that the noise model, not whether the optimizer runs inside the noisy loop, sets how strongly noise degrades the first-order transition. At N = 4, a noiseless control reaches 0.12% mean error, whereas the same circuit at 1.00% depolarizing noise reaches 25.69 to 52.81%. Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph) Cite as: arXiv:2609.30496 [quant-ph] (or arXiv:2609.30496v1 [quant-ph] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.30496 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Kaustav Bhowmick [view email] [v1] Thu, 24 Sep 2026 19:33:55 UTC (722 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Disentangling Expressibility, Symmetry Protection, and Hardware Noise in Variational Quantum Simulation of the Two-Flavor Schwinger Model, by Karthikeya Machiraju and 2 other authorsView PDFHTML (experimental)TeX Source view license Current browse context: quant-ph new | recent | 2026-09 References & Citations INSPIRE HEP NASA ADSGoogle Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Read Original

Tags

quantum-machine-learning
energy-climate
quantum-hardware
quantum-simulation

Source Information

Source: arXiv Quantum Physics

Discussion

0 professional contributions

Sign in to join this professional discussion.

Be the first to add a constructive contribution.