Built a composite scoring framework for quantum computing fundamentals versus hype. Looking for people to poke holes in it.

I'm coming at this from markets and business development, not physics, so take the framework with that in mind. I got tired of pricing quantum plays off headlines, so I built a six-signal composite score instead. The signals are error correction velocity, sovereign funding, hyperscaler capex, commercial use-case demos, qubit quality trajectory, and media coverage, which I'm actually using as a contrarian check, meaning more hype coverage nudges the score down, not up. I'm not looking for validation, I'm looking for someone closer to the hardware or the algorithms to tell me what's wrong with it. What am I overweighting, what am I missing entirely, and what would a domain expert throw out first? submitted by /u/Confident-Cat-145 [link] [comments]