Back to News
quantum-computing

Batched pattern search for QAOA parameter optimization on cloud-accessed quantum hardware

Muhammad Faryad
Loading...
4 min read
0 likes
⚡ Quantum Brief
A short scan over circuit depth at classically optimal parameters shows that on this device the measured solution quality peaks at two or three QAOA layers. We study a simple consequence of this for the quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA). AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
AI Audio Summary
0:00 / 0:00
Click to play
page-025-object-036.webp
Quantum News · Media Library

Quantum Physics arXiv:2609.13669 (quant-ph) [Submitted on 12 Sep 2026] Title:Batched pattern search for QAOA parameter optimization on cloud-accessed quantum hardware Authors:Muhammad Faryad View a PDF of the paper titled Batched pattern search for QAOA parameter optimization on cloud-accessed quantum hardware, by Muhammad Faryad View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:On a cloud-accessed quantum processor the classical optimizer of a variational algorithm communicates with the device through submitted jobs, and each job carries a queueing and turnaround overhead that does not depend on how many circuits it contains. We study a simple consequence of this for the quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA). An optimizer whose next set of trial parameters is known before any result returns can evaluate the whole set in one job, whereas a sequential optimizer such as COBYLA spends one job per function evaluation. We compare a batched pattern search with COBYLA on IBM's \ibmfez\ processor for cardinality-constrained portfolio selection with six to twelve assets, giving both optimizers the same number of jobs and the same number of shots. At every size the batched search reaches, after its first job, a parameter quality that the serial optimizer takes several jobs to match, and the two methods converge to comparable final values; repeating the eight-asset comparison from four starting points gives the same ordering each time. The instances are small enough to be solved exactly, which lets us check that the device's output distribution is correlated with the true ranking of portfolios and is clearly separated from a control circuit of the same depth with the cost layer removed. A short scan over circuit depth at classically optimal parameters shows that on this device the measured solution quality peaks at two or three QAOA layers. The protocol is described in enough detail to be reproduced, and the notebooks and raw counts are released. Comments: Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph) Cite as: arXiv:2609.13669 [quant-ph] (or arXiv:2609.13669v1 [quant-ph] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.13669 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Muhammad Faryad [view email] [v1] Sat, 12 Sep 2026 02:51:48 UTC (126 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Batched pattern search for QAOA parameter optimization on cloud-accessed quantum hardware, by Muhammad FaryadView PDFHTML (experimental)TeX Source view license Current browse context: quant-ph new | recent | 2026-09 References & Citations INSPIRE HEP NASA ADSGoogle Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Read Original

Tags

government-funding
quantum-algorithms
quantum-hardware

Source Information

Source: arXiv Quantum Physics

Discussion

0 professional contributions

Sign in to join this professional discussion.

Be the first to add a constructive contribution.