Back to News
technology

FBI is buying location data to track US citizens, director confirms

Zack Whittaker
Loading...
4 min read
0 likes
⚡ Quantum Brief
FBI Director Kash Patel confirmed the agency has resumed purchasing Americans’ location data from commercial brokers to aid investigations, reversing a 2023 pause. The data, sourced from consumer apps and games, bypasses traditional warrant requirements. Patel defended the practice as lawful under the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, claiming it provides "valuable intelligence." Senator Ron Wyden condemned it as a Fourth Amendment violation, calling it an "end-run around" constitutional protections. The FBI refused to disclose details, including data brokers used or frequency of purchases. Agencies increasingly exploit commercially available data to avoid judicial oversight, relying on untested legal theories. A bipartisan bill, the Government Surveillance Reform Act, was introduced to mandate warrants for such purchases. It aims to close loopholes allowing warrantless access to sensitive citizen data. Data brokers collect location information via ad-tech systems like real-time bidding, enabling surveillance firms to sell it to federal agencies. The FBI’s approach remains legally unchallenged in court.
AI Audio Summary
0:00 / 0:00
Click to play
Untitled design (14).png
Quantum News · Media Library

The FBI has resumed purchasing reams of Americans’ data and location histories to aid federal investigations, the agency’s director, Kash Patel, testified to lawmakers on Wednesday. This is the first time since 2023 that the FBI has confirmed it was buying access to people’s data collected from data brokers, who source much of their information — including location data — from ordinary consumer phone apps and games, per Politico. At the time, then-FBI director Christopher Wray told senators that the agency had bought access to people’s location data in the past but that it was not actively purchasing it. When asked by U.S.

Senator Ron Wyden, Democrat of Oregon, if the FBI would commit to not buying Americans’ location data, Patel said that the agency “uses all tools … to do our mission.” “We do purchase commercially available information that is consistent with the Constitution and the laws under the Electronic Communications Privacy Act — and it has led to some valuable intelligence for us,” Patel testified Wednesday. Wyden said buying information on Americans without obtaining a warrant was an “outrageous end-run around the Fourth Amendment,” referring to the constitutional law that protects people in America from device searches and data seizures. Sen. Wyden: Can you commit to not buying Americans' location data?Kash Patel: The FBI uses all tools to do our mission— Headquarters (@headquartersnews.bsky.social) 2026-03-18T15:54:43.567Z A spokesperson for the FBI did not respond to questions about the agency’s purchase of commercial data, including how often the FBI obtained location data and from which brokers. Government agencies typically have to convince a judge to authorize a search warrant based on some evidence of a crime before they can demand private information about a person from a tech or phone company. But in recent years, U.S. agencies have skirted this legal step by purchasing commercially available data from companies that amass large amounts of people’s location data originally derived from phone apps or other commercial tracking technology. For example, U.S. Customs and Border Protection purchased a tranche of data sourced from real-time bidding, or RTB, services, according to a document obtained by 404 Media. These technologies are central to the mobile and web advertising industry, and they collect information such as location and other identifiable data used to target people viewing ads. Surveillance firms can observe this process and gather information about a user’s location, and then potentially sell that data to brokers or federal agencies looking to circumvent the warrant process. The FBI claims it does not need a warrant to use this information for federal investigations; though this legal theory has not yet been tested in court. Last week, Wyden and several other lawmakers introduced a bipartisan, bicameral bill called the Government Surveillance Reform Act, which among other things would require a court-authorized warrant before federal agencies can buy Americans’ information from data brokers. Topics cybersecurity, FBI, fourth amendment, Government & Policy, location data, Privacy, privacy, Security, Trump Administration Zack Whittaker Security Editor Zack Whittaker is the security editor at TechCrunch. He also authors the weekly cybersecurity newsletter, this week in security. He can be reached via encrypted message at zackwhittaker.1337 on Signal. You can also contact him by email, or to verify outreach, at zack.whittaker@techcrunch.com.

View Bio June 9 Boston, MA Actively scaling? Fundraising? Planning your next launch?TechCrunch Founder Summit 2026 delivers tactical playbooks and direct access to 1,000+ founders and investors who are building, backing, and closing. REGISTER NOW Most Popular Why Garry Tan’s Claude Code setup has gotten so much love, and hate Julie Bort Apple quietly launches AirPods Max 2 Aisha Malik The billionaires made a promise — now some want out Connie Loizos US Army announces contract with Anduril worth up to $20B Anthony Ha Honda is killing its EVs — and any chance of competing in the future Tim De Chant Meta reportedly considering layoffs that could affect 20% of the company Anthony Ha ‘Not built right the first time’ — Musk’s xAI is starting over again, again Tim Fernholz

Read Original

Tags

partnership

Source Information

Source: TechCrunch

Discussion

0 professional contributions

Sign in to join this professional discussion.

Be the first to add a constructive contribution.