Elon Musk misled Twitter investors while trying to get out of acquisition, jury says

A civil jury in California on Friday ruled that Elon Musk intentionally misled Twitter investors when he tried to back out of his $44 billion acquisition of the platform in 2022. At the time, Musk had tweeted that Twitter had too many bots, which is why he later tried to renege on the acquisition. (Twitter ended up suing Musk to force him to seal the deal.) “Twitter deal temporarily on hold pending details supporting calculation that spam/fake accounts do indeed represent less than 5% of users,” Musk wrote on the platform that he has since renamed X. Twitter deal temporarily on hold pending details supporting calculation that spam/fake accounts do indeed represent less than 5% of usershttps://t.co/Y2t0QMuuyn— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) May 13, 2022 In the days after Musk posted this, Twitter shares declined 8%.

Investor Giuseppe Pampena filed suit against Musk on behalf of other former Twitter investors who had sold Twitter shares between May 13 (the day of the tweet) and October 4, the day the deal was finalized. Pampena’s lawsuit argued that Musk intentionally posted about his concerns with Twitter to create uncertainty about the platform’s stability to artificially drive down its stock price, causing those who sold shares during that window to suffer losses. Musk’s attorneys argued that he was expressing legitimate concerns about the number of bots on the app. But the jury was more convinced by the plaintiff’s argument. It is not yet clear how much money Musk will have to pay to those former Twitter shareholders, but Pampena’s attorney said that damages could reach up to $2.6 billion, according to CNBC. It’s not a huge blow for Musk, as Bloomberg estimates his net worth at over $660 billion. This isn’t Musk’s first experience going to court over tweets. In 2018, he tweeted that he had secured funding to take Tesla private at $420 per share, meaning he planned to buy out public shareholders and delist the company from stock exchanges. The SEC alleged that these posts were misleading, charging Musk with securities fraud. Musk later had to testify in court that he was not making a marijuana joke (420 being a widely recognized slang reference to cannabis) and maintained that he earnestly believed that he would take Tesla private at $420 per share, which was a substantial premium on Tesla’s stock price at that time. Techcrunch event Disrupt 2026: The tech ecosystem, all in one room Your next round. Your next hire. Your next breakout opportunity. Find it at TechCrunch Disrupt 2026, where 10,000+ founders, investors, and tech leaders gather for three days of 250+ tactical sessions, powerful introductions, and market-defining innovation. Register now to save up to $400. Save up to $300 or 30% to TechCrunch Founder Summit 1,000+ founders and investors come together at TechCrunch Founder Summit 2026 for a full day focused on growth, execution, and real-world scaling. Learn from founders and investors who have shaped the industry. Connect with peers navigating similar growth stages. Walk away with tactics you can apply immediatelyOffer ends March 13. San Francisco, CA | October 13-15, 2026 REGISTER NOW Musk emerged victorious in a similar lawsuit that shareholders filed about the “funding secured” tweet, but this time, he’ll have to pay up. After acquiring Twitter, Musk rebranded the company as X, then merged it with his newer AI company, xAI. The combined company was valued at $113 billion, according to Musk. Then, last month, SpaceX merged with xAI. Musk has said that the merger was motivated by his desire to build data centers in space.

Topics Elon Musk, Mergers and Acquisitions, Social, Twitter, X Amanda Silberling Senior Writer Amanda Silberling is a senior writer at TechCrunch covering the intersection of technology and culture. She has also written for publications like Polygon, MTV, the Kenyon Review, NPR, and Business Insider. She is the co-host of Wow If True, a podcast about internet culture, with science fiction author Isabel J. Kim. Prior to joining TechCrunch, she worked as a grassroots organizer, museum educator, and film festival coordinator. She holds a B.A. in English from the University of Pennsylvania and served as a Princeton in Asia Fellow in Laos. You can contact or verify outreach from Amanda by emailing amanda@techcrunch.com or via encrypted message at @amanda.100 on Signal.

View Bio June 9 Boston, MA Actively scaling? Fundraising? Planning your next launch?TechCrunch Founder Summit 2026 delivers tactical playbooks and direct access to 1,000+ founders and investors who are building, backing, and closing. REGISTER NOW Most Popular Employees had to restrain a dancing humanoid robot after it went wild at a California restaurant Amanda Silberling Nvidia is quietly building a multibillion-dollar behemoth to rival its chips business Rebecca Szkutak Why Garry Tan’s Claude Code setup has gotten so much love, and hate Julie Bort Apple quietly launches AirPods Max 2 Aisha Malik The billionaires made a promise — now some want out Connie Loizos US Army announces contract with Anduril worth up to $20B Anthony Ha Honda is killing its EVs — and any chance of competing in the future Tim De Chant