Back to News
research

I Plan to Claim Social Security at Full Retirement Age Just to Invest the Money. Is This Genius?

Money Magazine
Loading...
4 min read
0 likes
⚡ Quantum Brief
A Reddit user proposes claiming Social Security at 67 instead of 70 to invest the funds, arguing modest returns could outweigh delayed benefits, shifting the breakeven age to 90 for most retirees. Financial experts warn the 8% annual benefit increase from delaying claims is inflation-adjusted via COLA, meaning investors need higher-than-expected nominal returns (above 8%) to justify early withdrawal. Portfolio risk typically decreases near retirement, reducing potential investment gains. The 8% delayed benefit plus COLA often outperforms conservative portfolios, undermining the strategy’s appeal for most retirees. Life expectancy remains the biggest variable. While investing may extend the breakeven point, longer lifespans still favor delayed claims, as benefits are designed to replace 40% of retirement income. Critics note Social Security funds often cover essential expenses, not discretionary investments. Early claims could jeopardize financial stability if markets underperform or retirees outlive projections.
AI Audio Summary
0:00 / 0:00
Click to play
vecteezy_data-storage-center-quantum-computing-database-cloud_29725802.JPG
Quantum News · Media Library

We research all brands listed and may earn a fee from our partners. Research and financial considerations may influence how brands are displayed. Not all brands are included. Learn more.

Retirement Social Security Share Share Close Mail Page URL https://money.com/claim-social-security-age-67-invest/ Link copied! I Plan to Claim Social Security at Full Retirement Age Just to Invest the Money.

Is This Genius? By: Pete Grieve Pete Grieve Lead News Reporter | Joined September 2022 Pete Grieve is a personal finance reporter. In his time at Money, Pete has covered everything from car buying to credit cards to the housing market. Has also written: Why Millions of Taxpayers Could Get Bigger Refunds This Year Can AI File Your Taxes? More Importantly, Should You Let It? 'We Have Been Scratching Our Brains’: My Mom Just Received a Random $60,000 Social Security Deposit. Is This a Mistake? No Real ID? The TSA Will Now Charge You $45 to Fly I Earn $130,000 but Am Terrified of Layoffs. Should I Stop Funding My 401(k) to Pay off My Mortgage? See full bio Published: Feb 13, 2026 4 min read Money; Getty Images Does conventional wisdom about waiting to claim Social Security overlook the potential upside of investing benefits claimed earlier? It's a question financial professionals often hear from their clients, and one a Reddit user raises in a recent thread wondering whether they would be better off claiming Social Security at 67 — the full retirement age — instead of 70 because they could invest the money. Pet protection: See Lemonade's pet insurance options — save and protect your cat or dog from high vet bills. Typically, claiming at 70 is advantageous compared to claiming at 67 if a person goes on to live to past a breakeven age (generally in the early 80s), experts say. However, the user theorizes that if they can earn a "modest" return by investing, the math changes. In that case, "the only way I won't be better off taking Social Security at age 67 is if I live past 90!" the post reads. "I'm healthy, but that's still actuarially unlikely (<50% chance even for 67 yr old non smoker in excellent health, according to [an] online actuarial calculator)." So, how should you decide when to claim Social Security benefits, and is it smart to accelerate that timeline to invest the money? Free stock opportunity: Get up to $1,000 in stock with a new, funded SoFi Invest account. Expert advice: Think carefully about this strategy The post raises an important point: If a person is able to earn a return on Social Security benefits claimed at an earlier age, it can affect the calculus around the optimal claiming age. The decision is complex, and several factors are often overlooked. Joseph White, a portfolio manager at Johnson Investment Counsel, explains that delaying Social Security generally nets individuals an 8%-per-year benefit increase. Crucially, that increase is indexed to the inflation rate with the annual Social Security cost-of-living adjustment (COLA), which often comes in at about 3%. "Perhaps the most critical flaw that I see people make with their assumptions is that the 8% investment return they believe they need to make this work is nominal, meaning NOT inflation-adjusted," White writes in an email. If someone fails to account for the COLA, their calculations will be off: The true investment return they would need to make claiming at 67 beneficial would actually be higher. Also, around retirement age, investors typically shift their portfolios to limit risk exposure and protect their savings, often at the expense of higher annual returns. Investment returns are still part of the consideration, but that 8% increase plus the COLA may beat a modest gain from investing. Save smarter: Take control of your money with the Rocket Money budgeting app. No matter how someone plans to use the money, one major challenge in deciding when to claim Social Security is the unknown of life expectancy. Delaying benefits generally pays off for individuals who live longer. "If they are truly investing those payments, claiming earlier does become more relatively attractive and moves that breakeven age out a bit further," White explains. But in most cases, benefits are not exactly "extra" money to invest, says Matt Coursen, a relationship manager at Plante Moran Financial Advisors. "Social Security was designed to replace roughly 40% of retirement income, and many retirees rely on that monthly check to cover basic living expenses," Coursen adds. That's why the Reddit user, and anyone else considering this strategy, needs to think twice before claiming the benefits early. Can't Miss DealsCheck out Robinhood's online trading platform and get the first trade on themGet your first year of AARP for just $1574% off NordVPN right now — plus an Amazon gift card

Read Original

Tags

government-funding

Source Information

Source: Money Magazine

Discussion

0 professional contributions

Sign in to join this professional discussion.

Be the first to add a constructive contribution.