Back to News
research

Hassett says authors of New York Fed tariff study should be disciplined: 'Worst paper I've ever seen'

CNBC
Loading...
3 min read
0 likes
⚡ Quantum Brief
White House economic advisor Kevin Hassett demanded discipline for New York Fed researchers behind a February 2026 tariff study, calling it the "worst paper" in Fed history and "highly partisan." The study claimed U.S. consumers and businesses bear 90% of tariff costs, but Hassett argued it ignored wage gains from reshoring production and relied on flawed price-focused analysis. Hassett countered that tariffs lowered inflation, with import prices flat and real wages rising $1,400 annually, contradicting the Fed’s findings of consumer harm. January 2026 CPI data showed 2.4% annual inflation—down from 2025—while core CPI hit a five-year low, undermining claims of tariff-driven price surges. The New York Fed declined to comment, leaving the study’s methodology and Hassett’s allegations of professional misconduct unresolved.
AI Audio Summary
0:00 / 0:00
Click to play
Untitled design (34).png
Quantum News · Media Library

White House economic advisor Kevin Hassett said Wednesday that the authors of a recent New York Federal Reserve paper that found U.S. companies and consumers are shouldering most of the tariff burden should be "disciplined."In a CNBC interview, the National Economic Council director ripped the report, saying that central bank researchers ignored key aspects of how the duties worked and instead simply focused on prices. Hassett said the research also should have included the upward impact on wages and benefits that U.S. companies see by bringing more production onshore."I mean, the paper is an embarrassment," Hassett said during the "Squawk Box" interview. "It's, I think, the worst paper I've ever seen in the history of the Federal Reserve system. The people associated with this paper should presumably be disciplined, because what they've done is they've put out a conclusion which has created a lot of news that's highly partisan based on analysis that wouldn't be accepted in a first-semester econ class."The paper in question was published Feb. 12 on the New York Fed's website.Essentially, the researchers looked at whether countries that export products to the U.S. were lowering their prices, or in effect eating the tariffs, or raising their prices and passing them onto consumers and companies. The paper found that some 90% of the added costs from tariffs were being passed on, though it noted that the impact waned slightly as the year progressed.However, Hassett insisted that the tariffs had little impact on prices and were responsible for a better standard of living."Prices have gone down. Inflation is down over time. Import prices dropped a lot in the first half of the year, that leveled off, and real wages were up $1,400 on average last year, which means that consumers were made better off by the tariffs," he said. "So consumers couldn't have been made better off by the tariffs, if this New York Fed analysis was correct. It's really just an embarrassment. I can't imagine who signed off on it."The consumer price index in January rose 2.4% from a year ago and is up nearly 2% from April 2025, when President Donald Trump first announced the tariffs. Core CPI, which excludes food and energy, was up 2.5% in January, its lowest annual gain since March 2021. Import prices in December were flat from a year ago while export prices rose 3.1%, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.A New York Fed official declined comment.Got a confidential news tip? We want to hear from you.Sign up for free newsletters and get more CNBC delivered to your inboxGet this delivered to your inbox, and more info about our products and services.© 2026 Versant Media, LLC.

All Rights Reserved. A Versant Media Company. Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes. Global Business and Financial News, Stock Quotes, and Market Data and Analysis. Data also provided by

Read Original

Source Information

Discussion

0 professional contributions

Sign in to join this professional discussion.

Be the first to add a constructive contribution.