Wigner's Friend Paradox Revisited

Quantum Physics arXiv:2608.02635 (quant-ph) [Submitted on 30 Jul 2026] Title:Wigner's Friend Paradox Revisited Authors:Peter Reichert, Markus Enz View a PDF of the paper titled Wigner's Friend Paradox Revisited, by Peter Reichert and Markus Enz View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:By assuming (i) a universal, observer-independent quantum state, by considering (ii) measurement processes with wave function collapse as part of quantum mechanical time evolution (also within isolated systems), and by (iii) clearly distinguishing the state of a quantum system from the knowledge of conscious observers about this state, we suggest a modified Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics that resolves Wigner's Friend and extended Wigner's Friend paradoxes. The suggested interpretation leads to differences in some outcome probabilities compared to previous analyses which, in principle, make it possible to falsify the suggested modifications or the previous analyses (or both). The fundamental problem of the incompleteness of quantum mechanics in the Copenhagen interpretation regarding the lack of a precise definition and a mechanistic description of the measurement process (including the collapse of the wave function) is not addressed in this study. However, the argumentation regarding the resolution of Wigner's Friend paradoxes also applies to attempts for such a mechanistic description using collapse models with stochastic extensions to the Schrödinger equation or trying to model wave function collapse with unitary time evolution and irreversibility of the measurement process resulting from quantum statistical mechanics. Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph) Cite as: arXiv:2608.02635 [quant-ph] (or arXiv:2608.02635v1 [quant-ph] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.02635 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Peter Reichert [view email] [v1] Thu, 30 Jul 2026 19:45:55 UTC (20 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Wigner's Friend Paradox Revisited, by Peter Reichert and Markus EnzView PDFHTML (experimental)TeX Source view license Current browse context: quant-ph new | recent | 2026-08 References & Citations INSPIRE HEP NASA ADSGoogle Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)