Back to News
quantum-computing

Saylor: Quantum Computing Won't Break Bitcoin - TradingView — Track All Markets

Google News – Quantum Computing
Loading...
2 min read
0 likes
⚡ Quantum Brief
Michael Saylor argues quantum computing won’t break Bitcoin due to planned upgrades, framing the threat as a bullish catalyst for network evolution. He cites Bitcoin’s ability to implement quantum-resistant encryption via soft fork before quantum computers become powerful enough to crack ECDSA. Bitcoin’s defense relies on transitioning to quantum-secure signatures like Lamport or lattice-based cryptography. Active users will migrate funds to new addresses, while lost coins—unmovable due to missing keys—will remain frozen under consensus rules. Experts, including Grayscale, dismiss near-term quantum threats, projecting no cryptographically relevant quantum computer before 2030. They label current fears a "red herring" for the 2026 market, emphasizing Bitcoin’s real-time transaction requirements over static data risks. Unlike encrypted data (e.g., emails) vulnerable to future decryption, Bitcoin’s security depends on live transaction signing. Harvested data attacks don’t apply, reducing immediate exposure to quantum advances. Industry figures like Jameson Lopp support freezing old protocols post-migration, reinforcing Bitcoin’s adaptive resilience. The debate shifts from existential risk to proactive upgrades, with consensus favoring pragmatic solutions over panic.
AI Audio Summary
0:00 / 0:00
Click to play
99d6e805-9ff2-439c-ba4f-1232238f23dd.jpeg
Quantum News · Media Library

Saylor: Quantum Computing Won't Break Bitcoin1 min readBTCUSD+0.58%A recent social media post, Strategy co-founder Michael Saylor has reframed a common fear of quantum computers hacking Bitcoin into a bullish narrative. His argument relies on the technical mechanics of how Bitcoin upgrades and the economic consequences of "lost" coins."Quantum leap"Quantum computers could theoretically crack the Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (ECDSA) that protects Bitcoin private keys. If this happens, a bad actor could derive private keys from public keys and steal funds.However, before quantum computers become powerful enough to break ECDSA, the Bitcoin network will implement a soft fork to introduce quantum-resistant encryption (Lamport signatures or lattice-based cryptography).Once the quantum-secure upgrade is live, active users will move their Bitcoin from vulnerable addresses to quantum-secure ones. Lost coins cannot be moved since no one has the keys. These coins cannot be migrated to the new quantum-secure addresses.According to Saylor, the Bitcoin network consensus would likely agree to freeze the old protocol after the migration deadline passes."I agree, lost coins should stay frozen. Glad to hear you'll support my BIP!" Casa's Jameson Lopp said in response to the recent post. Overblown fearsThe prevailing view among institutional analysts (like Grayscale) and cryptographers is that the immediate threat is overblown.Most experts do not see a cryptographically relevant quantum computer emerging before 2030. Grayscale explicitly called quantum fears a "red herring" for the 2026 market.The only immediate threat is for encrypted data (like emails or government secrets) that can be harvested now and decrypted in 10 years. However, Bitcoin requires signing a transaction in real-time rather than decrypting old data.CryptoU.TodayRead more from U.TodayMore news from U.Today U.TodayCardano Founder Takes Dig at XRP and SOLU.Today‘Smartest Man Alive’ Keeps Shilling XRP, Calls It ‘Digital God’U.TodayXRP Whales Sold ETF Approval NewsU.TodaySolana to Surpass Ethereum in Yearly RevenueU.

Read Original

Tags

post-quantum-cryptography
quantum-computing

Source Information

Source: Google News – Quantum Computing

Discussion

0 professional contributions

Sign in to join this professional discussion.

Be the first to add a constructive contribution.