Restrictions on non-Clifford fault tolerance and ruling out beyond-SQL quantum metrology

Quantum Physics arXiv:2607.27342 (quant-ph) [Submitted on 29 Jul 2026] Title:Restrictions on non-Clifford fault tolerance and ruling out beyond-SQL quantum metrology Authors:Constantin Cedillo Vayson de Pradenne, Ishaan Kannan, Harald Putterman, Jordan Cotler View a PDF of the paper titled Restrictions on non-Clifford fault tolerance and ruling out beyond-SQL quantum metrology, by Constantin Cedillo Vayson de Pradenne and 3 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Quantum metrology promises a quadratic speedup over the standard quantum limit (SQL), but signal-aligned noise is expected to preclude this advantage in realistic settings. A potential route around known no-go results is to encode the sensors in a quantum code where the physical signal acts transversally as a logical gate. Understanding restrictions on transversal non-Clifford gates is therefore central to both quantum metrology and fault-tolerant quantum computation. Here, we prove such restrictions and apply them to transversal sensing. For any stabilizer code of distance $d\ge 3$ supporting a transversal logical action in level $D$ of the Clifford hierarchy, every stabilizer generating set must contain a check of weight at least $2^D$. Moreover, any $r$-level concatenated realization satisfies $r\leq \lfloor \log_2 n/D\rfloor$, forcing $r=1$ and ruling out concatenation when applied to beyond-SQL metrology. We then show that transversal single-qubit rotations by a small angle $\theta$ can only induce a nontrivial logical action on an $n$-qubit code if its checks include irreducible stabilizers of weight $\Omega(1/(n|\theta|^2))$. Here, many single-qubit errors commute with every stabilizer or logical Pauli below this weight and are only detected by a high-weight check, so their syndromes cannot be fault-tolerantly reconstructed from low-weight normalizer measurements. Since beyond-SQL transversal sensing requires $|\theta| = o(n^{-1/2})$, the weight of checks required for syndrome extraction diverges with $n$. Finally, we prove a broader metrological no-go theorem that avoids the assumptions of the quantum Cramér-Rao bound: constant-strength signal-aligned noise rules out any asymptotic advantage over the SQL in AC or DC sensing, even with biased estimators, nonstabilizer or approximate encodings, quantum memory, intermediate measurements, or adaptive control. Comments: Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph) Cite as: arXiv:2607.27342 [quant-ph] (or arXiv:2607.27342v1 [quant-ph] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.27342 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Ishaan Kannan [view email] [v1] Wed, 29 Jul 2026 18:01:14 UTC (717 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Restrictions on non-Clifford fault tolerance and ruling out beyond-SQL quantum metrology, by Constantin Cedillo Vayson de Pradenne and 3 other authorsView PDFHTML (experimental)TeX Source view license Current browse context: quant-ph new | recent | 2026-07 References & Citations INSPIRE HEP NASA ADSGoogle Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)