Back to News
quantum-computing

PropHunt: Automated Optimization of Quantum Syndrome Measurement Circuits

arXiv Quantum Physics
Loading...
4 min read
0 likes
⚡ Quantum Brief
Researchers from Princeton and the University of Chicago introduced an automated tool to optimize syndrome measurement circuits, a critical but overlooked component in fault-tolerant quantum computing. Unlike NISQ-era optimizers that focus on gate count or depth, this tool directly models how errors propagate within circuits, addressing a key gap in quantum error correction (QEC) performance evaluation. The tool iteratively improves circuit designs and can automatically rediscover hand-optimized solutions, demonstrating its effectiveness across multiple QEC codes. A novel application, Hook-ZNE, leverages the tool’s fine-grained error control to enhance zero-noise extrapolation, a leading error mitigation technique for near-term quantum devices. This work bridges a critical divide between theoretical QEC designs and their real-world implementation, offering a path to more reliable fault-tolerant quantum systems.
PropHunt: Automated Optimization of Quantum Syndrome Measurement Circuits

Summarize this article with:

Quantum Physics arXiv:2601.17580 (quant-ph) [Submitted on 24 Jan 2026] Title:PropHunt: Automated Optimization of Quantum Syndrome Measurement Circuits Authors:Joshua Viszlai, Satvik Maurya, Swamit Tannu, Margaret Martonosi, Frederic T. Chong View a PDF of the paper titled PropHunt: Automated Optimization of Quantum Syndrome Measurement Circuits, by Joshua Viszlai and 4 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computing (FTQC) relies on Quantum Error Correction (QEC) codes to reach error rates necessary for large scale quantum applications. At a physical level, QEC codes perform parity checks on data qubits, producing syndrome information, through Syndrome Measurement (SM) circuits. These circuits define a code's logical error rate and must be run repeatedly throughout the entire program. The performance of SM circuits is therefore critical to the success of a FTQC system. While ultimately implemented as physical circuits, SM circuits have challenges that are not addressed by existing circuit optimization tools. Importantly, inside SM circuits themselves errors are expected to occur, and how errors propagate through SM circuits directly impacts which errors are detectable and correctable, defining the code's logical error rate. This is not modeled in NISQ-era tools, which instead optimize for targets such as gate depth or gate count to mitigate the chance that any error occurs. This gap leaves key questions unanswered about the expected real-world effectiveness of QEC codes. In this work we address this gap and present PropHunt, an automated tool for optimizing SM circuits for CSS codes. We evaluate PropHunt on a suite of relevant QEC codes and demonstrate PropHunt's ability to iteratively improve performance and recover existing hand-designed circuits automatically. We also propose a near-term QEC application, Hook-ZNE, which leverages PropHunt's fine-grained control over logical error rate to improve Zero-Noise Extrapolation (ZNE), a promising error mitigation strategy. Comments: Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph) Cite as: arXiv:2601.17580 [quant-ph] (or arXiv:2601.17580v1 [quant-ph] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2601.17580 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Joshua Viszlai [view email] [v1] Sat, 24 Jan 2026 20:22:17 UTC (2,119 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled PropHunt: Automated Optimization of Quantum Syndrome Measurement Circuits, by Joshua Viszlai and 4 other authorsView PDFHTML (experimental)TeX Source view license Current browse context: quant-ph new | recent | 2026-01 References & Citations INSPIRE HEP NASA ADSGoogle Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) Links to Code Toggle Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Read Original

Tags

quantum-computing
quantum-hardware
quantum-error-correction

Source Information

Source: arXiv Quantum Physics