Back to News
quantum-computing

New bounds on private simultaneous quantum message passing

arXiv Quantum Physics
Loading...
4 min read
0 likes
⚡ Quantum Brief
Researchers introduced new upper and lower bounds for private simultaneous quantum message passing (PSM), a model for secure multiparty computation. For lower bounds, they showed Nečiporuk’s measure links entanglement requirements to PSM with perfect correctness, yielding quadratic bounds for certain functions. They also established that the rank of a function’s communication matrix lower-bounds 2-player quantum PSM with perfect privacy but imperfect correctness, offering new classical PSM insights. Upper bounds include a formula relating PSM complexity to quantum circuit size, depth, player count, input bits, and correctness parameters. Additionally, the square of a function’s Fourier 1-norm was proven to upper-bound classical PSM complexity.
New bounds on private simultaneous quantum message passing

Summarize this article with:

Quantum Physics arXiv:2606.12557 (quant-ph) [Submitted on 10 Jun 2026] Title:New bounds on private simultaneous quantum message passing Authors:Uma Girish, Alex May, Natalie Parham, Henry Yuen View a PDF of the paper titled New bounds on private simultaneous quantum message passing, by Uma Girish and 3 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:In the private simultaneous message (PSM) setting, $k$ players obtain inputs $x_i\in\{0,1\}^n$ and then each send messages to a referee, who should learn $f(x_1,...,x_k)$ but no other information about $(x_1,...,x_k)$. The PSM setting was introduced as a minimal model for secure multiparty computation and has connections to Boolean function complexity. In the quantum setting, PSM has been related to non-local quantum computation (NLQC). The communication and correlation cost of implementing PSM remains poorly understood. Here, we give new upper and lower bounds on the (quantum) PSM model. For lower bounds, we show: 1) Nečiporuk's measure lower bounds the entanglement required for $k$-player quantum PSM with perfect correctness. This leads to quadratic lower bounds for explicit functions. 2) The rank of the communication matrix of $f(x_1,x_2)$ lower bounds 2-player quantum PSM with perfect privacy but imperfect correctness. This implies a previously unknown lower bound on classical PSM with imperfect correctness. When allowing quantum communication and shared entanglement, these are the first lower bounds on quantum PSM that make use of the privacy condition. For upper bounds, we show: 1) Letting $s$ be the size of a quantum circuit computing $f$, $d_f$ be the circuit depth, $k$ the number of players, $n$ the number of bits received by each player, and $\epsilon$ a correctness parameter, we obtain $\mathsf{PSM}_k^*(f) \leq (kn +s) \cdot \log^{O(d_f)}(s/\epsilon)$. 2) The square of the Fourier 1 norm of $f$, $\Vert \hat{f}\Vert_1^2$, upper bounds the classical PSM complexity, $\mathsf{PSM}(f)\leq O(\Vert \hat{f} \Vert^2_1)$. In proving the first upper bound, we generalize existing $T$-depth based techniques for NLQC from $2$ to $k\geq 2$ parties, and consider cases where the Clifford layers are restricted to having small light cones. Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph) Cite as: arXiv:2606.12557 [quant-ph] (or arXiv:2606.12557v1 [quant-ph] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.12557 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Alex May [view email] [v1] Wed, 10 Jun 2026 18:07:16 UTC (39 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled New bounds on private simultaneous quantum message passing, by Uma Girish and 3 other authorsView PDFHTML (experimental)TeX Source view license Current browse context: quant-ph new | recent | 2026-06 References & Citations INSPIRE HEP NASA ADSGoogle Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Read Original

Tags

quantum-investment
quantum-geopolitics
quantum-communication

Source Information

Source: arXiv Quantum Physics