Back to News
quantum-computing

Minimizing the Number of Code Switching Operations in Fault-Tolerant Quantum Circuits

Erik Weilandt, Tom Peham, Robert Wille
Loading...
3 min read
0 likes
⚡ Quantum Brief
Researchers Erik Weilandt, Tom Peham, and Robert Wille introduced a polynomial-time solution to minimize code-switching operations in fault-tolerant quantum circuits, addressing a critical bottleneck in universal quantum computation. Code switching—transferring quantum information between different error-correcting codes—enables universal gate sets but increases overhead and error rates, making minimization essential for practical fault-tolerant systems. The team frames the problem as a minimum-cut graph optimization, reducing computational complexity while allowing flexibility for constraints like idle-period switching or code preference biases. This marks the first automated, logical-level approach to optimizing code-switching circuits, eliminating manual compilation inefficiencies and improving scalability for large-scale quantum algorithms. The method balances trade-offs between time, space, and error rates, offering a adaptable framework for future fault-tolerant quantum architectures.
AI Audio Summary
0:00 / 0:00
Click to play
8eaedf23-5eba-49d5-9b8a-62223a528def.jpeg
Quantum News · Media Library

Quantum Physics arXiv:2512.04170 (quant-ph) [Submitted on 3 Dec 2025] Title:Minimizing the Number of Code Switching Operations in Fault-Tolerant Quantum Circuits Authors:Erik Weilandt, Tom Peham, Robert Wille View a PDF of the paper titled Minimizing the Number of Code Switching Operations in Fault-Tolerant Quantum Circuits, by Erik Weilandt and 2 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Fault-tolerant quantum computers rely on Quantum Error-Correcting Codes (QECCs) to protect information from noise. However, no single error-correcting code supports a fully transversal and therefore fault-tolerant implementation of all gates required for universal quantum computation. Code switching addresses this limitation by moving quantum information between different codes that, together, support a universal gate set. Unfortunately, each switch is costly-adding time and space overhead and increasing the logical error rate. Minimizing the number of switching operations is, therefore, essential for quantum computations using code switching. In this work, we study the problem of minimizing the number of code switches required to run a given quantum circuit. We show that this problem can be solved efficiently in polynomial time by reducing it to a minimum-cut instance on a graph derived from the circuit. Our formulation is flexible and can incorporate additional considerations, such as reducing depth overhead by preferring switches during idle periods or biasing the compilation to favor one code over another. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first automated approach for compiling and optimizing code-switching-based quantum computations at the logical level. Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph) Cite as: arXiv:2512.04170 [quant-ph] (or arXiv:2512.04170v1 [quant-ph] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2512.04170 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Erik Weilandt [view email] [v1] Wed, 3 Dec 2025 19:00:05 UTC (667 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Minimizing the Number of Code Switching Operations in Fault-Tolerant Quantum Circuits, by Erik Weilandt and 2 other authorsView PDFHTML (experimental)TeX Source view license Current browse context: quant-ph new | recent | 2025-12 References & Citations INSPIRE HEP NASA ADSGoogle Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) Links to Code Toggle Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Read Original

Tags

quantum-computing
quantum-error-correction
quantum-investment

Source Information

Source: arXiv Quantum Physics

Discussion

0 professional contributions

Sign in to join this professional discussion.

Be the first to add a constructive contribution.