Microsoft’s Quantum Chief Doesn’t Care That Scientists Don’t Believe His Results - WIRED

Save StorySave this storySave StorySave this storyThe man leading Microsoft’s multibillion-dollar scheme to build a quantum computer says he isn’t interested in appeasing scientists.When Zulfi Alam’s team claimed last year to have effectively split an electron into so-called Majorana quasiparticles in its bid to reinvent computing, some scientists simply didn’t believe the software giant. They cited inconclusive data in Microsoft’s research papers and the lack of peer-review analysis for many of the results. But Alam, Microsoft’s corporate vice president of quantum, tells WIRED with a chuckle, “I don’t really care.”Microsoft is one of several tech powerhouses racing alongside a raft of startups to build commercially useful quantum computers. The goal for these companies is to create computers that could solve currently impossible problems in fields from drug development to defense by exploiting quantum mechanics to process units of information, known as bits, in a fundamentally different way than how classical machines do. (There are also concerns that quantum computers will be used to crack encryption.) Companies are taking different approaches to constructing quantum bits—“qubits” for short—including using neutral atoms, charged atoms, and light.While Microsoft’s approach is theoretically promising, Majorana particles, which were first hypothesized nearly 90 years ago, have proved elusive. The firm’s longest-running research project has also been plagued by controversies. Last year’s breakthrough announcement was met with intense skepticism by scientists, because they couldn’t rule out that other physical phenomena were driving the signals Microsoft had used to draw its conclusion. In 2021, Microsoft retracted a quantum computing paper from Nature that claimed to have found evidence of Majorana particles after independent physicists pointed out issues in the data analysis.In June, the software giant said it had produced a qubit that’s 1,000 times more reliable than its predecessor, using Microsoft’s scientific discovery AI agent. But scientists are still questioning the Majorana work underpinning the breakthrough, as Microsoft refuses to share the raw data behind its results.“Why should I?” Alam asks rhetorically.He points to the commercial sensitivity of his work, which he says means the team cannot publicize the granular data that scientists are asking for. He also complains that the publishing process is too slow, pointing out that a paper published in Nature in June was based on work done two years before.“The world has changed in two years, so this notion of having peer reviews and publications doesn't work in this fast-moving world right now,” Alam says, while noting he believes there aren’t enough experts to speed up the process. “That’s why this paper thing is kind of boring now.”Scientists aren’t satisfied with that explanation. “The field is growing, there are a lot of experts outside of these firms that are able to reliably assess claims and scientific work,” says physicist Trevor Lanting, chief development officer at Nasdaq-listed quantum computer maker D-Wave Quantum, which has similarly faced accusations of inflating claims.Having claims evaluated by science is “part of the healthy process of really establishing the science and the technical foundation for the technology,” Lanting adds, “so when a company or group says they don’t have time, I would read that as ‘our results aren’t strong enough to stand up to that scrutiny.’”Alam still doesn’t think he needs to prove his work—which he took the time to doodle a diagram of in my notebook—to anyone. Instead, he plans to win over academics with the working machine. Microsoft has said it will be able to create a useful quantum computer by 2029.The feedback from the scientific community “motivates us to be even faster,” he says, “because our mission is black-and-white: Get this machine up and let the machine do the work.”CommentsBack to topJoin the discussionCommentsBack to topTriangleYou Might Also LikeIn your inbox: Inside WIRED’s newsroom with Katie DrummondYouTube and X have become ‘gateways’ to nudify appsBig Story: For Taylor Swift, MSG’s controversial cameras briefly went darkPete Hegseth’s plan for ‘high T’ troops is a junk-science fever dreamHow to find us: Add WIRED.com to your preferred sources in GoogleTopicsquantum computingMicrosoftcomputer sciencephysicsThe Most Dangerous AI Hacking Techniques Still Have Humans in the LoopSecurity researcher James Kettle tried to push the limit of AI’s hacking abilities—and discovered how effective it can be when combined with human expertise.Lily Hay NewmanScientists’ Side Hustle? Using AI and Quantum Computing to Generate New PeptidesResearchers cobbled together funding and time to show how quantum computing could aid in the development of drugs to help underserved populations and combat rare diseases.Isabella WardThis Former Intel CEO Wants to Jumpstart Moore’s Law With LightPat Gelsinger wants to pave the way to ever more powerful artificial intelligence using tiny beams of light.Joel KhaliliA Sneaky Hacking Tool Targeting AI Infrastructure Is Lurking in Victims’ Blind SpotsA new type of malware can worm deep into AI coding systems to steal data and logins—and can flip a “death switch” to destroy files and keep out real users.Lily Hay NewmanI Built a Self-Improving AI, and So Can YouExperiments in using AI to build AI show that the future doesn’t just belong to the frontier labs.Will KnightOpenAI Models Escaped Containment and Hacked Hugging FaceThe cybersecurity-focused models, including GPT-5.6 Sol, broke out of a testing sandbox, exploited a zero-day, and gained access to the open internet to pull off the attack.Lily Hay NewmanIt’s Frighteningly Easy to Jailbreak Some Frontier AI ModelsI watched a new tool try to get around the model safeguards of four major frontier companies. You might be surprised by how they performed.Will KnightLinkedIn Won’t Be Expanding Its Data Centers in the Next YearDespite the ongoing AI boom, LinkedIn is holding the line on compute spending. Instead, it’s challenging engineers to make every GPU count.Paresh DaveEuropean Researchers Say Big Tech Is Blocking Access to Their DataEU law gives researchers unprecedented rights to scrutinize social media data. Researchers say TikTok, X, and Meta impede their attempts to look inside.Anna DesmaraisPrompt Injection Attacks Are Thwarting AI Hacking Agents“Context bombing” tricks malicious AI agents into shutting down before they can do harm.Dan Goodin, Ars TechnicaPython Is So Slow.

Can Julia Solve the Two-Language Problem?By some benchmarks, Julia code can run 10X to 1,000X faster than Python—but there’s a reason it’s not a very popular programming language.Sheon HanOpenAI’s Hacking Debacle Comes Down to Human ErrorIf the generative AI giant had followed well-known security best practices, it’s likely that its AI agent would never have escaped to the open internet and hacked multiple companies.Lily Hay Newman