Back to News
quantum-computing

Methodological Realism and Quantum Mechanics

Michael E. Cuffaro
Loading...
4 min read
0 likes
⚡ Quantum Brief
Philosopher Michael E. Cuffaro distinguishes two definitions of a "complete" quantum theory: one demanding full description of reality, the other requiring only tools to predict phenomena at any precision. Neo-Everettian interpretations (e.g., many-worlds) pursue the first definition, claiming quantum mechanics fully describes reality, while neo-Bohrian views adopt the second, prioritizing predictive utility over ontological completeness. The paper frames quantum theory as a "natural generalization" of classical physics, emphasizing how its probabilistic descriptions extend—not replace—classical frameworks, aligning with Bohr’s original perspective. Cuffaro contrasts metaphysical realism (seeking absolute reality) with methodological realism (focusing on empirical adequacy), arguing these philosophies underpin the Everett-Bohr divide yet paradoxically reinforce each other’s validity. Despite opposing goals, the two interpretations may complementarily address quantum mechanics’ foundational challenges, offering dual pathways to understanding its completeness.
AI Audio Summary
0:00 / 0:00
Click to play
vecteezy_data-storage-center-quantum-computing-database-cloud_29725802.JPG
Quantum News · Media Library

Quantum Physics arXiv:2512.02169 (quant-ph) [Submitted on 1 Dec 2025] Title:Methodological Realism and Quantum Mechanics Authors:Michael E. Cuffaro View a PDF of the paper titled Methodological Realism and Quantum Mechanics, by Michael E. Cuffaro View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:I distinguish two senses in which one can take a given physical theory to be `complete'. On the first, a complete physical theory is one that, in principle, completely describes physical reality. On the second, a complete physical theory is one that provides all of the conceptual resources one needs to describe any (in general probabilistic) physical phenomenon to any level of detail one likes, in principle. I argue that while the (neo-)Everettian approach to interpreting quantum mechanics aims to show that it is complete in the first sense, the (neo-)Bohrian approach begins from an understanding of quantum mechanics as being complete in the second sense. I then discuss some of the essential differences between how classical and quantum theory describe phenomena, and the way in which the quantum description can be thought of as a ``natural generalisation'' (to use Bohr's phrase) of the classical description. Finally, I elaborate upon the two visions of physics from which one can motivate the first and the second sense of completeness, respectively: \emph{metaphysical realism}, on the one hand, and what I will call \emph{methodological realism}, on the other -- and discuss what one can say about the significance of the differences between quantum and classical description from each of these points of view. I suggest that there is a sense in which the views of (neo-)Everett and the views of (neo-)Bohr can be understood to be mutually supporting positions, from their respective perspectives, even though they are diametrically opposed. Comments: Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph); History and Philosophy of Physics (physics.hist-ph) Cite as: arXiv:2512.02169 [quant-ph] (or arXiv:2512.02169v1 [quant-ph] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2512.02169 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Michael Cuffaro [view email] [v1] Mon, 1 Dec 2025 20:07:53 UTC (41 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Methodological Realism and Quantum Mechanics, by Michael E. CuffaroView PDFHTML (experimental)TeX Source view license Current browse context: quant-ph new | recent | 2025-12 Change to browse by: physics physics.hist-ph References & Citations INSPIRE HEP NASA ADSGoogle Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) Links to Code Toggle Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Read Original

Source Information

Source: arXiv Quantum Physics

Discussion

0 professional contributions

Sign in to join this professional discussion.

Be the first to add a constructive contribution.