An LLM just accepted my paper. I think.
Summarize this article with:
Hello everyone, I’m a (new still) quantum systems researcher for context. Short story: a while ago I got a pretty obviously AI-generated peer review (among other things, it cited a non-existent section) and it shocked me to my core, so lately I’m wary of those. I and my colleagues just submitted 2 papers to a national conference and I’m happy to say that they both got accepted with some minor revisions. However one of the reviews starts with "Okay, so here is my honest assessment of the manuscript . . ." and it even has an emoji somewhere in there. I have to say though that the criticisms were valid and addressed in the camera ready version. The other 2 reviewers were obviously human and they also accepted the paper. What would you recommend doing in such a scenario? submitted by /u/skarlatov [link] [comments]