Back to News
quantum-computing

Learning the closest Slater determinant

Nisarga Paul, Haimeng Zhao, David D. Dai
Loading...
3 min read
0 likes
⚡ Quantum Brief
--> Quantum Physics arXiv:2607.20623 (quant-ph) [Submitted on 22 Jul 2026] Title:Learning the closest Slater determinant Authors:Nisarga Paul, Haimeng Zhao, David D. Dai View a PDF of the paper titled Learning the closest Slater determinant, by Nisarga Paul and 2 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Learning compact, interpretable descriptions of quantum many-body states is an important task in quantum science. We study the task of learning the Slater determinant with maximum fidelity to an arbitrary fermionic many-body state, with motivation from both Hartree-Fock methods and agnostic tomography.
AI Audio Summary
0:00 / 0:00
Click to play
LogicQubit3.png
Quantum News · Media Library

Quantum Physics arXiv:2607.20623 (quant-ph) [Submitted on 22 Jul 2026] Title:Learning the closest Slater determinant Authors:Nisarga Paul, Haimeng Zhao, David D. Dai View a PDF of the paper titled Learning the closest Slater determinant, by Nisarga Paul and 2 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Learning compact, interpretable descriptions of quantum many-body states is an important task in quantum science. We study the task of learning the Slater determinant with maximum fidelity to an arbitrary fermionic many-body state, with motivation from both Hartree-Fock methods and agnostic tomography. Given an $n$-fermion wavefunction built from $m$ fermionic modes, we provide classical and quantum algorithms returning a Slater determinant with fidelity within $\varepsilon$ of maximal in time $m^{\text{poly}(n,1/\varepsilon)}$. We prove matching hardness lower bounds, assuming standard complexity conjectures, along some parameter axes. Given access to quantum copies, we prove this can be accomplished with $\text{poly}(m,n,1/\varepsilon)$ copies of $\rho$. We also show that above a fidelity of $2/3$ any stationary point is the unique global maximum while below $2/3$ the optimization landscape can have spurious stationary points, and hence $2/3$ marks a transition point in the optimization landscape for this problem. We apply the algorithm to the Fermi-Hubbard model, extracting the closest Slater determinant from neural quantum state solutions. Together, our results provide algorithmic tools with provable guarantees in understanding fermionic many-body systems with classical or quantum simulation. Comments: Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph); Disordered Systems and Neural Networks (cond-mat.dis-nn); Strongly Correlated Electrons (cond-mat.str-el) Cite as: arXiv:2607.20623 [quant-ph] (or arXiv:2607.20623v1 [quant-ph] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.20623 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Nisarga Paul [view email] [v1] Wed, 22 Jul 2026 18:00:04 UTC (4,301 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Learning the closest Slater determinant, by Nisarga Paul and 2 other authorsView PDFHTML (experimental)TeX Source view license Current browse context: quant-ph new | recent | 2026-07 Change to browse by: cond-mat cond-mat.dis-nn cond-mat.str-el References & Citations INSPIRE HEP NASA ADSGoogle Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Read Original

Tags

quantum-algorithms
quantum-simulation

Source Information

Source: arXiv Quantum Physics

Discussion

0 professional contributions

Sign in to join this professional discussion.

Be the first to add a constructive contribution.