Back to News
quantum-computing

Interaction-Conditional Semantics and the Dissolution of Quantum Paradoxes

arXiv Quantum Physics
Loading...
3 min read
51 views
0 likes
⚡ Quantum Brief
Jonathon Sendall’s January 2026 paper argues that quantum paradoxes—like spin measurement, double-slit experiments, and Wigner’s friend—stem from a shared semantic error: mistaking interaction-dependent outcomes for intrinsic properties. The work introduces four principles restricting predictions to configuration-relative terms, anchoring quantum outcomes in measurement geometry while maintaining objectivity—without requiring new physics or interpretive additions. Bell’s theorem and Kochen-Specker results are recast not as dynamical puzzles but as evidence that intrinsic-property semantics clash with empirical reality, demanding relational frameworks instead. The proposed "relational objectivity" avoids extremes of naive realism or observer-dependent subjectivism, offering a middle path grounded in physical interaction contexts rather than abstract properties. Key quantum puzzles dissolve uniformly under this approach, which treats them as artifacts of misapplied semantics rather than fundamental mysteries of nature.
Interaction-Conditional Semantics and the Dissolution of Quantum Paradoxes

Summarize this article with:

Quantum Physics arXiv:2601.18810 (quant-ph) [Submitted on 20 Jan 2026] Title:Interaction-Conditional Semantics and the Dissolution of Quantum Paradoxes Authors:Jonathon Sendall View a PDF of the paper titled Interaction-Conditional Semantics and the Dissolution of Quantum Paradoxes, by Jonathon Sendall View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:This paper argues that several canonical puzzles in quantum mechanics, including spin measurement, the double slit, entanglement correlations, and Wigner's friend, share a common origin in a semantic error and the illicit promotion of interaction conditional outcomes to intrinsic properties. I introduce four principles that license only configuration relative predication, grounding outcomes in physical measurement geometry while preserving objectivity. Applying these principles uniformly dissolves each puzzle without new physics or ad hoc interpretive machinery. Bell's theorem and the Kochen-Specker theorem are reframed not as dynamical mysteries but as constraints on permissible explanatory structure, evidence that intrinsic-outcome semantics is incompatible with empirical reality. The result is a relational objectivity that avoids both naive property realism and observer subjectivism. Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph); History and Philosophy of Physics (physics.hist-ph) Cite as: arXiv:2601.18810 [quant-ph] (or arXiv:2601.18810v1 [quant-ph] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2601.18810 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Jonathon Sendall Mr [view email] [v1] Tue, 20 Jan 2026 01:22:22 UTC (15 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Interaction-Conditional Semantics and the Dissolution of Quantum Paradoxes, by Jonathon SendallView PDFHTML (experimental)TeX Source view license Current browse context: quant-ph new | recent | 2026-01 Change to browse by: physics physics.hist-ph References & Citations INSPIRE HEP NASA ADSGoogle Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) Links to Code Toggle Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Read Original

Source Information

Source: arXiv Quantum Physics