Back to News
quantum-computing

How "Quantum" is your Quantum Computer? Macrorealism-based Benchmarking via Mid-Circuit Parity Measurements

Ben Zindorf, Lorenzo Braccini, Debarshi Das, Sougato Bose
Loading...
4 min read
0 likes
⚡ Quantum Brief
Researchers introduced a macrorealism-based benchmark to test quantum computers’ "quantumness" at scale, using violations of the No Disturbance Condition (NDC) via parity measurements on N qubits. Ideal systems show N-independent violations, but noisy hardware reveals a quantum-to-classical transition as qubit count grows. The team demonstrated two loophole-free methods: one using mid-circuit measurements to probe wavefunction collapse, the other leveraging reversible entanglement. Both minimize classical disturbances, ensuring statistically negligible errors in benchmarking real-world devices. Experiments on IBM’s quantum processors detected macrorealism violations up to 38 qubits—an order-of-magnitude improvement over prior records. This marks the largest-scale validation of quantum behavior in noisy intermediate-scale systems to date. Benchmarking two generations of IBM quantum computers revealed a threefold improvement in "quantumness" using the NDC metric. The scalable approach offers a foundationally grounded way to track progress as hardware evolves toward fault tolerance. Published in November 2025, the work provides a practical tool for quantum hardware developers to quantify non-classical behavior at macroscopic scales, bridging foundational physics with real-world device characterization.
AI Audio Summary
0:00 / 0:00
Click to play
Quantum computing technology
Unsplash · Validated Fallback

Quantum Physics arXiv:2511.15881 (quant-ph) [Submitted on 19 Nov 2025] Title:How "Quantum" is your Quantum Computer? Macrorealism-based Benchmarking via Mid-Circuit Parity Measurements Authors:Ben Zindorf, Lorenzo Braccini, Debarshi Das, Sougato Bose View a PDF of the paper titled How "Quantum" is your Quantum Computer? Macrorealism-based Benchmarking via Mid-Circuit Parity Measurements, by Ben Zindorf and 3 other authors View PDF Abstract:To perform meaningful computations, Quantum Computers (QCs) must scale to macroscopic levels - i.e., to a large number of qubits - an objective pursued by most quantum companies. How to efficiently test their quantumness at these scales? We show that the violation of Macrorealism (MR), being the fact that classical systems possess definite properties that can be measured without disturbances, provide a fruitful avenue to this aim.

The No Disturbance Condition (NDC) - the equality used here to test MR - can be violated by two consecutive parity measurements on $N$ qubits and found to be independent of $N$ under ideal conditions. However, realistic noisy QCs show a quantum-to-classical transition as $N$ increases, giving a foundationally-motivated scalable benchmarking metric. Two methods are formulated to implement this metric: one that involves a mid-circuit measurement, probing the irreversible collapse of the wavefunction, in contrast to the reversible entanglement generated in the other. Both methods are designed to be clumsiness-loophole free: the unwanted classical disturbances are negligible within statistical error. Violation of MR is detected on a IBM QC up to $N = 38$ qubits, increasing $N$ by one order of magnitude over best known results of MR. Two QCs are benchmarked using the proposed NDC metric, showing a three-fold improvement in their quantumness from one generation to the next. Comments: Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph) Cite as: arXiv:2511.15881 [quant-ph] (or arXiv:2511.15881v1 [quant-ph] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2511.15881 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Ben Zindorf [view email] [v1] Wed, 19 Nov 2025 21:15:54 UTC (976 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled How "Quantum" is your Quantum Computer? Macrorealism-based Benchmarking via Mid-Circuit Parity Measurements, by Ben Zindorf and 3 other authorsView PDFTeX Source view license Current browse context: quant-ph new | recent | 2025-11 References & Citations INSPIRE HEP NASA ADSGoogle Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) Links to Code Toggle Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Read Original

Tags

ibm
quantum-computing
quantum-hardware

Source Information

Source: arXiv Quantum Physics

Discussion

0 professional contributions

Sign in to join this professional discussion.

Be the first to add a constructive contribution.