Back to News
quantum-computing

Gate Teleportation Achieves Scalable Quantum Computing, Avoiding 10-fold Overhead of Circuit Cutting

Rohail T.
Loading...
4 min read
0 likes
⚡ Quantum Brief
Quantum Physics arXiv:2510.08894 (quant-ph) [Submitted on 10 Oct 2025] Title:Gate Teleportation vs Circuit Cutting in Distributed Quantum Computing Authors:Shobhit Gupta, Nikolay Sheshko, Daniel J. Dilley, Alvin Gonzales, Manish K. Singh, Zain H. Saleem View a PDF of the paper titled Gate Teleportation vs Circuit Cutting in Distributed Quantum Computing, by Shobhit Gupta and 5 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Distributing circuits across quantum processor modules will enable the execution of circuits larger than the qubit count limitations of monolithic processors. While distributed quantum computation has primarily utilized circuit cutting, it incurs an exponential growth of sub-circuit sampling and classical
AI Audio Summary
0:00 / 0:00
Click to play
Quantum computing technology
Unsplash · Validated Fallback

Quantum Physics arXiv:2510.08894 (quant-ph) [Submitted on 10 Oct 2025] Title:Gate Teleportation vs Circuit Cutting in Distributed Quantum Computing Authors:Shobhit Gupta, Nikolay Sheshko, Daniel J. Dilley, Alvin Gonzales, Manish K. Singh, Zain H. Saleem View a PDF of the paper titled Gate Teleportation vs Circuit Cutting in Distributed Quantum Computing, by Shobhit Gupta and 5 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Distributing circuits across quantum processor modules will enable the execution of circuits larger than the qubit count limitations of monolithic processors. While distributed quantum computation has primarily utilized circuit cutting, it incurs an exponential growth of sub-circuit sampling and classical post-processing overhead with an increasing number of cuts. The entanglement-based gate teleportation approach does not inherently incur exponential sampling overhead, provided that quantum interconnects of requisite performance are available for generating high-fidelity Bell pairs. Recent advances in photonic entanglement of qubits have motivated discussion on optical link metrics required to achieve remote gate performance approaching circuit-cutting techniques. We model noisy remote (teleported) gates between superconducting qubits entangled via noisy microwave-to-optical (M2O) transducers over optical links. We incorporate the effect of the transducer noise added ($N_{add}$) on the Bell pair fidelity and inject noisy Bell pairs into remote CNOT gates. We perform a comparative simulation of Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger (GHZ) states generated between processor modules using remote gates and gate cuts by studying the dependence of the Hellinger fidelity on the primary source of error for the two approaches. We identify break-even points where noisy remote gates achieve parity with gate-cuts. Our work suggests that a 10-fold reduction in the present M2O transducer noise added figures would favor generating multipartite entangled states with remote gates over circuit cutting due to an exponential sampling overhead for the latter. Our work informs near-term quantum interconnect hardware metrics and motivates a network-aware hybrid quantum-classical distributed computation approach, where both quantum links and circuit cuts are employed to minimize quantum runtime. Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph) Cite as: arXiv:2510.08894 [quant-ph] (or arXiv:2510.08894v1 [quant-ph] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2510.08894 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Shobhit Gupta [view email] [v1] Fri, 10 Oct 2025 01:14:22 UTC (856 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Gate Teleportation vs Circuit Cutting in Distributed Quantum Computing, by Shobhit Gupta and 5 other authorsView PDFHTML (experimental)TeX Source view license Current browse context: quant-ph new | recent | 2025-10 References & Citations INSPIRE HEP NASA ADSGoogle Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) Links to Code Toggle Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Read Original

Tags

government-funding
quantum-computing
quantum-hardware
superconducting-qubits

Source Information

Source: Quantum Zeitgeist

Discussion

0 professional contributions

Sign in to join this professional discussion.

Be the first to add a constructive contribution.