Back to News
quantum-computing

Estimating and decoding coherent errors of QEC experiments with detector error models

Evangelia Takou, Kenneth R. Brown
Loading...
3 min read
0 likes
⚡ Quantum Brief
Researchers Evangelia Takou and Kenneth R. Brown demonstrate that syndrome histories in quantum error correction (QEC) experiments can directly detect and estimate coherent errors without requiring separate device benchmarking. Their method proves experimentally derived detector error models effectively handle both stochastic and coherent noise, eliminating the need for regime-specific adjustments in repetition and surface codes. Using Majorana and Monte Carlo simulators, the team modeled fully coherent and stochastic noise, revealing interference effects that either amplify or suppress physical error rates compared to stochastic-only scenarios. The study identifies hyperedges absent in Pauli-twirled models, highlighting how coherent errors introduce unique error structures that standard stochastic models fail to capture. Decoding under coherent noise yields different error thresholds than stochastic assumptions, underscoring the need to revise detector error models for real-world quantum computing applications.
AI Audio Summary
0:00 / 0:00
Click to play
Quantum computing technology
Unsplash · Validated Fallback

Quantum Physics arXiv:2510.23797 (quant-ph) [Submitted on 27 Oct 2025] Title:Estimating and decoding coherent errors of QEC experiments with detector error models Authors:Evangelia Takou, Kenneth R. Brown View a PDF of the paper titled Estimating and decoding coherent errors of QEC experiments with detector error models, by Evangelia Takou and Kenneth R. Brown View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Decoders of quantum error correction (QEC) experiments make decisions based on detected errors and the expected rates of error events, which together comprise a detector error model. Here we show that the syndrome history of QEC experiments is sufficient to detect and estimate coherent errors, removing the need for prior device benchmarking experiments. Importantly, our method shows that experimentally determined detector error models work equally well for both stochastic and coherent noise regimes. We model fully-coherent or fully-stochastic noise for repetition and surface codes and for various phenomenological and circuit-level noise scenarios, by employing Majorana and Monte Carlo simulators. We capture the interference of coherent errors, which appears as enhanced or suppressed physical error rates compared to the stochastic case, and also observe hyperedges that do not appear in the corresponding Pauli-twirled models. Finally, we decode the detector error models undergoing coherent noise and find different thresholds compared to detector error models built based on the stochastic noise assumption. Comments: Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph) Cite as: arXiv:2510.23797 [quant-ph] (or arXiv:2510.23797v1 [quant-ph] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2510.23797 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Evangelia Takou [view email] [v1] Mon, 27 Oct 2025 19:28:40 UTC (412 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Estimating and decoding coherent errors of QEC experiments with detector error models, by Evangelia Takou and Kenneth R. BrownView PDFHTML (experimental)TeX Source view license Current browse context: quant-ph new | recent | 2025-10 References & Citations INSPIRE HEP NASA ADSGoogle Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) Links to Code Toggle Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Read Original

Tags

quantum-error-correction
quantum-finance
topological-qubit

Source Information

Source: arXiv Quantum Physics

Discussion

0 professional contributions

Sign in to join this professional discussion.

Be the first to add a constructive contribution.