Error correction on an array of superconducting qubits with defective components

Quantum Physics arXiv:2607.12118 (quant-ph) [Submitted on 13 Jul 2026] Title:Error correction on an array of superconducting qubits with defective components Authors:Julien M. Drouet, Xanda C. Kolesnikow, Campbell K. McLauchlan, Georgia M. Nixon, Seok-Hyung Lee, Dominic J. Williamson, Stephen D. Bartlett, Benjamin J. Brown, Robin Harper View a PDF of the paper titled Error correction on an array of superconducting qubits with defective components, by Julien M. Drouet and 8 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:A solid-state quantum-computing architecture will require the fabrication of arrays of many coupled qubits. It is inevitable that this process will produce qubits and couplers with varying performance, with some components underperforming due to imperfect fabrication. Quantum error-correction requires high-performing components and hence these defects must be dealt with, either by adapting the code to exclude the defects, or by informing the decoder to accommodate defects in post-processing. Here we implement and compare strategies to operate distance-5 surface codes on a quantum processor consisting of a square-lattice array of 120 superconducting qubits. We demonstrate a dramatic reduction in the probability of a logical error in a memory experiment by excluding underperforming components, compared with both a standard approach of ignoring defects, and a defect-aware decoding approach. We observe up to 2.8X improvement in logical errors per round when excluding defects compared with the standard defect-ignorant approach (1.62% compared to 4.49%). In contrast, defect-aware decoding gives only modest gains. Defects are also expected to be particularly harmful for measurement-based logical operations. Using a stability experiment we show that excluding defects resurrects measurement-based logic gate performance, observing a 6.3% per-round suppression of failure rate when excluding defects, compared to zero suppression otherwise. Furthermore, we show a further substantial decrease in logical errors when using leakage post-selection in combination with our defect exclusion strategies, resulting in a distance-5 code outperforming the best distance-3 in one basis. Our experiments therefore give a proof-of-principle demonstration of the essential utility of defect exclusion methods in the scale-up of solid-state quantum computing approaches. Comments: Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph) Cite as: arXiv:2607.12118 [quant-ph] (or arXiv:2607.12118v1 [quant-ph] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.12118 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Stephen D. Bartlett [view email] [v1] Mon, 13 Jul 2026 19:53:50 UTC (2,090 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Error correction on an array of superconducting qubits with defective components, by Julien M. Drouet and 8 other authorsView PDFHTML (experimental)TeX Source view license Current browse context: quant-ph new | recent | 2026-07 References & Citations INSPIRE HEP NASA ADSGoogle Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)