Back to News
quantum-computing

COMET: Combinatorial Optimization for Multiplex Editing Targets Via Constraint-Preserving QAOA

Priyansh Singhal, Sumit Maheshwari, Piyush Joshi
Loading...
4 min read
0 likes
⚡ Quantum Brief
A team led by Priyansh Singhal, Sumit Maheshwari, and Piyush Joshi introduced COMET, a method comparing constraint-enforcement strategies for multiplex CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing using QAOA. Their study targets immune-checkpoint genes PDCD1, LAG3, and HAVCR2 on a twelve-qubit system. In simulations, the XY-mixer approach achieved over 95% probability of finding the optimal solution at QAOA depth p=3, while penalty-based methods stayed below 6% across all depths. On IBM’s ibmkingston processor, the XY-mixer maintained an energy gap within |0.8|, whereas the worst penalty variant reached +53.9, highlighting hardware noise resilience.
Why it matters

This work advances practical quantum optimization by demonstrating that structural constraint enforcement can outperform heuristic penalties, offering a clearer path to scalable, noise-resilient solutions for real-world combinatorial problems like gene editing.

AI Audio Summary
0:00 / 0:00
Click to play
growtika-TKAg3WignSw-unsplash.jpg
Quantum News · Media Library

Quantum Physics arXiv:2607.02622 (quant-ph) [Submitted on 2 Jul 2026] Title:COMET: Combinatorial Optimization for Multiplex Editing Targets Via Constraint-Preserving QAOA Authors:Priyansh Singhal, Sumit Maheshwari, Piyush Joshi View a PDF of the paper titled COMET: Combinatorial Optimization for Multiplex Editing Targets Via Constraint-Preserving QAOA, by Priyansh Singhal and 2 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Multiplex CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing requires selecting one guide RNA per target gene subject to cross-gene interactions: a constrained combinatorial problem that can be formulated as a Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) and solved via the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA). The one-hot per-gene constraint is conventionally enforced by adding quadratic penalty terms to the cost Hamiltonian, but penalty coefficient selection is heuristic and penalties amplify hardware noise. An alternative is to enforce the constraint structurally via the XY-mixer, which preserves feasibility by construction. We present COMET, a systematic comparison of penalty-based and XY-mixer QAOA on a three-gene, twelve-qubit multiplex editing instance targeting the immune-checkpoint genes PDCD1, LAG3, and HAVCR2. In simulation, the XY-mixer exceeds 95% probability of the optimum by QAOA depth p=3, while three penalty variants spanning an order of magnitude in penalty coefficient remain below 6% at every depth. On IBM's ibm_kingston (Heron r2) processor, the XY-mixer's simulator-hardware energy gap stays within |0.8| across all depths, while the worst-tuned penalty variant's gap reaches +53.9. We provide an honest account of where the structural guarantee partially breaks under gate-level noise. The twelve-qubit instance is classically trivial; our contribution is a methodological comparison of constraint-enforcement strategies in a biologically motivated domain, with real-hardware validation. Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2607.02622 [quant-ph] (or arXiv:2607.02622v1 [quant-ph] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.02622 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Priyansh Singhal [view email] [v1] Thu, 2 Jul 2026 08:37:59 UTC (692 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled COMET: Combinatorial Optimization for Multiplex Editing Targets Via Constraint-Preserving QAOA, by Priyansh Singhal and 2 other authorsView PDFHTML (experimental)TeX Source view license Current browse context: quant-ph new | recent | 2026-07 Change to browse by: cs cs.AI References & Citations INSPIRE HEP NASA ADSGoogle Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Read Original

Tags

quantum-optimization
energy-climate
quantum-algorithms
quantum-hardware

Source Information

Source: arXiv Quantum Physics

Discussion

0 professional contributions

Sign in to join this professional discussion.

Be the first to add a constructive contribution.