The USPS is nearing a financial breaking point, postmaster general warns: 'We were thrown an anchor'

USPS is running out of cash, the Postmaster General warned during congressional testimony. Jakub Porzycki/NurPhoto via Getty Images 2026-03-18T22:09:36.706Z Share Copy link Email Facebook WhatsApp X LinkedIn Bluesky Threads lighning bolt icon An icon in the shape of a lightning bolt.

Impact Link Save Saved Read in app This story is available exclusively to Business Insider subscribers. Become an Insider and start reading now. Have an account? Log in. The USPS could run out of cash within a year, David Steiner warned. Steiner said the agency may need to raise its borrowing limit or increase prices to stay afloat. USPS risks losing a significant share of its Amazon shipping business. The head of the US Postal Service is warning lawmakers that the agency would run out of cash within the next year unless Congress steps in. Loading audio narration... On Tuesday, David Steiner, the postmaster general, called the situation a "critical juncture" during a House Oversight hearing."In about a year from now, the Postal Service would be unable to deliver the mail if we continue the status quo," Steiner said. "I like to say that we got thrown overboard and into the water. But, instead of tossing us a life jacket, we were thrown an anchor." The agency is federally mandated to deliver mail to every address — rural or urban — across the US, six days a week.USPS hasn't turned a profit since 2006. Last fiscal year, the 250-year-old agency said it lost $9 billion, following a $9.5 billion loss in the fiscal year 2024. The agency's debt limit, meanwhile, rests at $15 billion.To help address the problems, Steiner, who took over as USPS's top role last year, proposed increasing the agency's borrowing authority and raising stamp prices. USPS isn't designed to operate like a typical profit-driven company, Amrou Awaysheh, the associate professor of operations and supply chain at Indiana University, said. It's designed instead to deliver important packages — including prescriptions, mail-in ballots, and letters — to all residents."Private carriers frequently hand off the 'last mile' to USPS in these places because the routes aren't profitable for them," Awaysheh told Business Insider. "If USPS has to pull back, there is no obvious private player ready to match its universal coverage at the same prices." Steiner said part of the agency's financial challenges stems from Americans sending fewer letters.He pointed to a dramatic long-term decline in mail volume. At its peak in 2006, USPS delivered 213 billion pieces annually. That has plunged to about 109 billion today — a drop he said represents roughly $81 billion in lost revenue at current stamp prices. Right now, he reported that 71% of USPS delivery routes are losing money. USPS said fewer Americans are sending mail. It's lost more than $18 billion since 2024. : Spencer Jones/GHI/UCG/Universal Images Group via Getty Images "No company could weather that much revenue loss," Steiner said. USPS is also facing the possibility of losing a significant portion of its package business with Amazon, its largest customer.According to a person familiar with the matter, USPS could lose at least two-thirds of its Amazon shipping volume by the fall. An Amazon spokesperson said in a statement that it "wanted to increase our volumes with the USPS," but the agency "abruptly walked away at the eleventh hour."USPS didn't immediately respond to a request for comment from Business Insider. "Losing Amazon's high volume, high-frequency stream will be difficult to replace in a competitive market," Donnafay MacDonald, the retail industry research director at Info-Tech Research Group, told Business Insider. "The issue at hand is the effect this has on USPS per unit costs, as relatively lower volumes usually lead to increased per unit costs."Steiner said on Tuesday that his agency needs to bring in more cash — and added that it won't get there just by making more cuts to services or jobs. "We can do anything you want," he said. "But someone has to pay for it."