Back to News
investment

Tim Scott hopes Fed Chair Powell investigation 'goes away' to clear Kevin Warsh confirmation

CNBC
Loading...
3 min read
0 likes
⚡ Quantum Brief
Sen. Tim Scott urged the federal investigation into Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell to conclude quickly, enabling confirmation hearings for Kevin Warsh, Trump’s nominee to replace Powell as Fed chief. Sen. Thom Tillis blocked Warsh’s nomination until the Powell probe resolves, citing Fed independence concerns and calling the situation a "foul" against institutional integrity. Powell skipped a scheduled February congressional testimony due to the criminal investigation, which stems from his 2025 Senate Banking Committee testimony, though Scott insists no crime occurred. Scott called Powell “woefully unprepared” during past hearings but reiterated he sees no criminal wrongdoing, pushing to advance Warsh’s confirmation “as soon as possible.” Sen. Kevin Cramer predicted bipartisan support for Warsh, emphasizing no ideological barriers exist, while Tillis warned against perceptions of presidential influence over the Fed.
AI Audio Summary
0:00 / 0:00
Click to play
Generate images of quantum computing to be used as banner image for articles (3).jpg
Quantum News · Media Library

Sen. Tim Scott on Wednesday said he hopes the federal investigation into Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell "goes away" so the Senate can take up the nomination of Kevin Warsh, President Donald Trump's pick to replace the head of the U.S. central bank."That proceeding going away allows for us to get the Fed fully functioning, back on target," Scott, who chairs the Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee, said during an appearance on CNBC's "Squawk Box."Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., has vowed to hold up any Fed nominees until a federal criminal investigation into Powell is resolved. Trump floated the idea of firing Powell last year and lashed out at the Fed chair for refusing to cut interest rates to the extent he desired. Powell has denied any wrongdoing and has said he is being targeted for refusing to accede to Trump's demands. Powell was expected to testify before Congress on Feb. 11, but missed that date because of the federal probe, Scott said."I had a conversation with Jay about his testimony," Scott said. "I recommended that he come before the committee.""At this point he is more concerned about the criminal proceeding ," he said. "And I get that."Congress can compel an elected official to testify, but the Banking committee did not do that with Powell in this case.The Fed declined to comment on whether Powell refused to testify.Tillis is otherwise supportive of Warsh, who Trump nominated for the role in January, but doubled down on his blockade after meeting with the Fed nominee on Tuesday. "This is not about people, it's about process," Tillis said. "I think this is a foul.""This is about this is bedrock principle of Fed independence," Tillis told reporters Tuesday. "I have no earthly idea what the market reaction would have been if suddenly the perception is that the Fed chair serves at the pleasure of the president."Sen. Kevin Cramer, R-N.D., another Banking committee member, told CNBC earlier Wednesday he sees no reason why some Democrats won't support Warsh's nomination."There's really no reason by anything from he's ever said or that he's done that, that Democrats shouldn't support his nomination," Cramer, who was scheduled to meet with Warsh on Wednesday, said. "They're going to be rigorous, of course, in their interviewing of him and and the cross examination ... when his hearing takes place. But I think we should be on track to get him across the finish line so that there's no gap between ... the end of Jay Powell's term and the beginning of the new term."The investigation into Powell is in part based on testimony Powell gave to the Senate Banking committee last year. Scott has said in the past that he did not believe Powell committed a crime in his testimony, sentiment he repeated Wednesday. He said the Senate would begin confirmation hearings for Warsh "as soon as possible.""At the end of the day … when he was before the committee he definitely was unprepared," Scott said of Powell. "I think he was woefully unprepared. But he did not commit a criminal act when he was before the committee."—Steve Liesman contributed to this report.Got a confidential news tip? We want to hear from you.Sign up for free newsletters and get more CNBC delivered to your inboxGet this delivered to your inbox, and more info about our products and services.© 2026 Versant Media, LLC.

All Rights Reserved. A Versant Media Company. Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes. Global Business and Financial News, Stock Quotes, and Market Data and Analysis. Data also provided by

Read Original

Source Information

Discussion

0 professional contributions

Sign in to join this professional discussion.

Be the first to add a constructive contribution.