Back to News
investment

This Signal Has Coincided With Every Recession of the Past 65 Years; It Just Flashed Again

newsfeedback@fool.com (David Dierking)
Loading...
4 min read
0 likes
⚡ Quantum Brief
The Sahm rule—a recession indicator tracking rapid unemployment spikes—was triggered in July 2024 when the U.S. jobless rate rose 0.54% over 12 months, marking its first activation since the pandemic. Historically, this signal has preceded every recession in the past 65 years, typically flashing at the onset of downturns before unemployment surges further. Despite the warning, no recession materialized yet, defying the rule’s perfect track record, as job losses unfolded gradually rather than abruptly. Current labor data shows minimal job growth (181,000 in 2025) and a creeping unemployment rate, suggesting a slowdown but not an immediate crisis. While GDP remains strong and inflation eases, analysts warn the Sahm trigger and weakening job trends signal potential economic turbulence ahead.
AI Audio Summary
0:00 / 0:00
Click to play
ilya-pavlov-OqtafYT5kTw-unsplash.jpg
Quantum News · Media Library

The Sahm rule is a measure of labor market deterioration, and it has historically been an accurate recession indicator.The labor market is one of the strongest indicators of overall economic health. When companies are hiring and workers feel secure in their jobs, they both tend to spend more and drive up demand for goods and services. When businesses dial back on hiring plans or lay people off, consumers tend to spend cautiously. Today, the U.S. labor market is at a bit of a middle ground. The unemployment rate has slowly crept higher and job growth has been minimal, but there hasn't been a sustained contraction in the number of jobs. And the unemployment rate is still below 5%, generally a sign of near-full employment. Still, investors and analysts are always on the lookout for warning signs. Image source: Getty Images. The Sahm indicator has historically signaled job market stress The Sahm indicator (or Sahm rule) was developed by former Federal Reserve economist Claudia Sahm specifically to trigger a warning quickly but avoid false alarms. The rule is simple -- a recession signal occurs when the three-month moving average of the U.S. unemployment rate rises by at least 0.5% above its lowest level in the prior 12 months. In other words, if the unemployment rate is rising relatively quickly, it almost always signals that a recession is coming. Let's take a look at the past 65 years worth of data to see how this signal has performed. Image source: FRED. Historically, the Sahm rule has in most cases, been triggered right at the beginning of a recession. Once that 0.5%-increase-over-12-months rule is triggered, the unemployment rate usually shoots much higher from there. The Sahm rule just triggered again; investors should expect a recession In July 2024, the Sahm rule was officially triggered when the unemployment rate rose by 0.54% over the previous 12-month window. In theory, that should have triggered a recession, but it hasn't. Yet. If the Sahm rule is triggered without a recession, it would be the first time it's happened over the past six decades. But what we've seen over the past 12 to 18 months has been a slow and gradual deterioration in the jobs market, not a sudden one. If you take a look at 2025's non-farm payroll figures, the U.S. economy added just 181,000 jobs. In the big picture, that's nearly flat growth. And the unemployment rate has slightly ticked up over time. I don't think there's any question the labor market is slowing. It's just happening at a much slower pace than it has in the past. Are we headed toward a recession? Perhaps slowly, but likely not yet. GDP growth is strong enough and inflation is easing enough that it appears a recession isn't imminent. But we shouldn't ignore what the jobs market data is telling us, nor where the current economic trends are heading. The fact that the Sahm rule already triggered once recently should serve as a warning. We're probably not through the storm yet.Read NextFeb 21, 2026 •By Daniel Foelber3 Brilliant Growth Stock ETFs to Buy Now and Hold for the Long TermFeb 21, 2026 •By Selena MaranjianIf You'd Invested $1,000 in Fluor Stock (FLR) 5 Years Ago, Here's How Much You'd Have Today (It's Probably More Than You Expected)Feb 21, 2026 •By Katie BrockmanShould You Really Invest in the Stock Market Right Now? History Offers a Clear Answer.Feb 21, 2026 •By Sean WilliamsPresident Donald Trump's Nomination of Kevin Warsh to Become Fed Chair May Come With Unintended Consequences for Wall StreetFeb 21, 2026 •By Katie BrockmanIf You'd Invested $5,000 in the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF 15 Years Ago, Here's What You'd Have TodayFeb 21, 2026 •By Adria CiminoThe Stock Market Just Did This for the First Time in Nearly a Year. History is Strikingly Clear About What Happens Next.

Read Original

Source Information

Source: The Motley Fool

Discussion

0 professional contributions

Sign in to join this professional discussion.

Be the first to add a constructive contribution.