Back to News
investment

Small Cap Value ETFs: IWN Boasts Greater Small Cap Exposure But SLYV Has a Higher Yield

newsfeedback@fool.com (Jake Lerch)
Loading...
4 min read
0 likes
⚡ Quantum Brief
Two small-cap value ETFs—SLYV and IWN—compete for investor attention in March 2026, with IWN outperforming on returns but charging higher fees. IWN holds 1,402 stocks (vs. SLYV’s 460), offering broader diversification and heavier exposure to financials and real estate, while SLYV focuses on cyclicals and industrials. Performance favors IWN: its 25.9% 1-year return beats SLYV’s 19.4%, with shallower five-year drawdowns, though SLYV’s 0.15% expense ratio undercuts IWN’s 0.24%. SLYV offers a higher 1.9% dividend yield compared to IWN’s 1.6%, appealing to income-focused investors despite its narrower portfolio. IWN’s $12.5B AUM dwarfs SLYV’s $4.1B, providing greater liquidity, but cost-conscious investors may prefer SLYV’s lower fees.
AI Audio Summary
0:00 / 0:00
Click to play
dcbb6659-0daf-4a2e-923f-3b6f2f91cf21.jpeg
Quantum News · Media Library

By Jake Lerch – Updated Mar 16, 2026 at 10:20AM ESTKey PointsIWN holds over three times as many stocks as SLYV, with heavier exposure to real estate and financialsIWN has delivered a higher 1-year return and shallower drawdown over five years, but charges a higher expense ratioBoth funds are highly liquid, but IWN’s larger assets under management may appeal to investors seeking scaleThe State Street SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV +1.07%) and the iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN +1.46%) both target U.S. small-cap value stocks, but IWN charges a higher fee, holds many more companies, and has outperformed on recent total return.Both SLYV and IWN aim to capture the value segment of the U.S. small-cap market, but they differ in index construction and depth of coverage. This comparison examines their costs, risks, recent performance, sector tilts, and portfolio makeup to help investors decide which approach may better fit their goals.Snapshot (cost & size)MetricSLYVIWNIssuerSPDRISharesExpense ratio0.15%0.24%1-yr return (as of 2026-03-11)19.4%25.9%Dividend yield1.9%1.6%Beta1.021.03AUM$4.1 billion$12.5 billionBeta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from five-year monthly returns. The 1-yr return represents total return over the trailing 12 months.SLYV looks more affordable in terms of fees, charging 0.15% compared to IWN’s 0.24%, while SLYV also offers a slightly higher dividend yield. The difference in expenses may add up over time for cost-conscious investors.Performance & Risk ComparisonMetricSLYVIWNMax drawdown (5 y)-28.68%-26.71%Growth of $1,000 over 5 years$1,074$1,124What's InsideIWN tracks a broad small-cap value universe, holding 1,402 stocks and spanning 25.6 years of history. Its largest sector weights are financial services at 24%, followed by industrials and real estate, t 11%. Each Top holding, such as Echostar Corp Class A(SATS +5.03%), Hecla Mining(HL 1.22%), and Ttm Technologies Inc, accounts for less than 1.1% of assets, reflecting wide diversification. No notable structural quirks are present.SLYV, by contrast, holds 460 companies focused on financial services, consumer cyclicals, and industrials, with more concentrated top positions like Eastman Chemical Co(EMN +2.08%), Lkq Corp(LKQ 0.20%), and Jackson Financial Inc A(JXN +1.78%), all at roughly one percent. This narrower approach may create subtle differences in sector risk and performance patterns.For more guidance on ETF investing, check out the full guide at this link.What this means for investorsBoth State Street SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) and iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN) offer exposure to U.S. small-cap value stocks. Yet, there are differences between these two ETFs.IWN holds nearly three times as many stock positions (1,402 vs. 460) as SLYV, offering greater diversification. In addition, IWN has posted a higher return over the last year (25.9% vs. 19.4%). Finally, IWN offers greater liquidity with $12.5 billion in AUM versus $4.1 billion for SLYV.Yet, SLYV tops IWN on some other key ETF metrics. SLYV, for example, has a lower expense ratio (0.15% vs. 0.24%). It also boasts a higher dividend yield of 1.9% compared to IWN’s 1.6%.In summary, IWN’s diversification, higher recent returns, and larger assets under management may appeal to investors seeking scale.On the other hand, SLYV’s lower expense ratio and slightly higher yield could attract those focused on cost efficiency.Read NextMar 12, 2026 •By Andy GouldIWN vs. VBR: Which Small-Cap Value ETF Is the Better Buy?Feb 8, 2026 •By Adé HennisIJJ vs. IWN: Can the Mid-Cap ETF Compete with a Small-Cap Fund?Jan 10, 2026 •By Jake LerchISCV vs. IWN: ISCV Offers Lower Costs But IWN Provides Greater LiquidityJan 5, 2026 •By Katie BrockmanIWN vs. ISCV: Which Small-Cap ETF Is the Best Choice for Investors?Dec 27, 2025 •By Sara AppinoVBR vs. IWN: Does Vanguard's Low Fee Beat iShares' Broader Diversification?Dec 21, 2025 •By Josh Kohn-LindquistVanguard vs. iShares: Is VBR or IWN the Superior Small-Cap Value ETF?About the AuthorJake Lerch is a contributing Motley Fool technology analyst covering artificial intelligence, cloud computing, cybersecurity, e-commerce, and semiconductors. Prior to The Motley Fool, Jake worked for 12 years at Credit Suisse, an international investment bank. He holds a bachelor’s degree in business with a concentration in economics from the University of North Carolina at Wilmington.TMFRescueDogStocks MentionediShares Trust - iShares Russell 2000 Value ETFNYSEMKT: IWN$189.39(+1.46%)+$2.73SPDR Series Trust - State Street SPDR S&P 600 Tm Small Cap Value ETFNYSEMKT: SLYV$93.85(+1.07%)+$0.99*Average returns of all recommendations since inception. Cost basis and return based on previous market day close.

Read Original

Source Information

Source: The Motley Fool

Discussion

0 professional contributions

Sign in to join this professional discussion.

Be the first to add a constructive contribution.