Back to News
investment

Small-Cap Growth ETFs: SLYG Boasts Higher Yield, While VBK Has Lower Fees

newsfeedback@fool.com (Jake Lerch)
Loading...
4 min read
0 likes
⚡ Quantum Brief
Vanguard’s VBK outperformed SLYG with a 23% one-year return versus 18.3%, while charging a lower 0.05% expense ratio compared to SLYG’s 0.15%, making it the cost-efficient leader in small-cap growth ETFs as of March 2026. SLYG offers a higher 0.8% dividend yield—versus VBK’s 0.5%—and a shallower five-year max drawdown (-29.18% vs. -38.39%), appealing to income-focused investors prioritizing risk mitigation over growth. VBK holds 579 stocks with heavier allocations to technology (26%) and industrials (23%), while SLYG’s 339 holdings split evenly between industrials, tech, and healthcare, reflecting differing sector exposure strategies. VBK’s $40 billion AUM dwarfs SLYG’s $4 billion, suggesting greater liquidity and stability, though SLYG’s 25-year track record provides long-term performance data for conservative investors. Both ETFs target small-cap growth but cater to distinct priorities: VBK for low-cost growth, SLYG for income and drawdown resilience.
AI Audio Summary
0:00 / 0:00
Click to play
8377ec08-9e06-4a8f-b6b0-006509aa5665.jpeg
Quantum News · Media Library

By Jake Lerch – Mar 16, 2026 at 10:49AM ESTKey PointsVBK charges a lower expense ratio than SLYG and has delivered a higher 1-year total returnSLYG offers a higher dividend yield of 0.8% versus VBK’s 0.5%, and experienced a shallower maximum drawdown of -29.18% over five years compared to -38.39% for VBK.VBK holds more stocks with a stronger tilt toward technology and industrials, while SLYG splits its largest sector weights more evenlyVanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK +1.72%) keeps costs low and has outperformed on total returns recently, while State Street SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG +1.57%) pays a bit more in dividends and features less severe drawdowns.Both VBK and SLYG aim to capture the performance of U.S. small-cap growth stocks, but they differ in cost, sector exposures, and recent performance. This comparison looks at key metrics, including expenses, yield, risk, and portfolio makeup, to highlight which fund may appeal depending on specific investor priorities.Snapshot (cost & size)MetricVBKSLYGIssuerVanguardSPDRExpense ratio0.05%0.15%1-yr return (as of 2026-03-11)23.0%18.3%Dividend yield0.5%0.8%Beta1.171.06AUM$40.0 billion$4.0 billionBeta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from five-year monthly returns. The 1-yr return represents total return over the trailing 12 months.VBK is more affordable in terms of fees with an expense ratio of 0.05% compared to SLYG’s 0.15%, while SLYG offers a slightly higher dividend yield at 0.8% versus VBK’s 0.5%—a modest advantage for those seeking current income.Performance & risk comparisonMetricVBKSLYGMax drawdown (5 y)-38.39%-29.18%Growth of $1,000 over 5 years$1,097$1,086What's insideSLYG tracks an S&P index focused on small-cap growth stocks with 339 holdings, balancing its top sector weights between industrials (19%), technology (19%), and healthcare (17%). Its largest positions as of the latest data are Interdigital Inc., CareTrust REIT Inc.(CTRE +1.42%), and Sitime Corp.(SITM +7.25%), each with a weighting of just over 1%. The fund has been around for more than 25 years, offering a long performance track record.VBK, by contrast, holds 579 stocks—offering broader diversification—and leans more heavily into technology (26%) and industrials (23%), with healthcare at 17%. Its top holdings include Rocket Lab Corp (RKLB +3.42%), Comfort Systems USA Inc (FIX +2.85%), and Sandisk Corp (SNDK +8.07%), each with around 1.2% of assets. There are no unusual features or quirks called out for either ETF.For more guidance on ETF investing, check out the full guide at this link.What this means for investors Both Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK) and State Street SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG) deliver exposure to small-cap growth stocks. That said, there are some key differences between them.VBK holds nearly twice as many stocks (579) as SLYG, which gives it greater diversification. As for fees, VBK comes out on top with a lower expense ratio of 0.05%. It has also performed better over the last year, with a 23.0% one-year return, compared to 18.3% for SLYV. Finally, VBK has greater liquidity, with 10x SLYV’s AUM ($40 billion vs. $4 billion).There are, however, areas where SLYV tops VBK. Yield is one. SLYV has a dividend yield of 0.8%. In addition, SLYV, despite its smaller number of holdings, has a smaller max drawdown over the last five years. The largest drawdown SLVY has experienced is -29.2%, while VBK dropped by 38.4%.In summary, VBK’s diversification, higher recent returns, lower fees, and larger assets under management may appeal to investors seeking growth at a low cost.On the other hand, SLYV’s higher yield and lower max drawdown could attract those focused on capital preservation and slightly higher income.Read NextJan 24, 2026 •By Sarah SidlowInvesting in Small-Cap ETFs: ISCG's Lower Fees or SLYG's Higher Dividend?Jan 11, 2026 •By Robert IzquierdoBetter Small-Cap Growth ETF: Vanguard's VBK vs. State Street's SLYGDec 20, 2025 •By Cory RenauerThe IJT and SLYG ETFs Nearly Match on Small Cap Growth ExposureAbout the AuthorJake Lerch is a contributing Motley Fool technology analyst covering artificial intelligence, cloud computing, cybersecurity, e-commerce, and semiconductors. Prior to The Motley Fool, Jake worked for 12 years at Credit Suisse, an international investment bank. He holds a bachelor’s degree in business with a concentration in economics from the University of North Carolina at Wilmington.TMFRescueDogStocks MentionedSPDR Series Trust - State Street SPDR S&P 600 Tm Small Cap Growth ETFNYSEMKT: SLYG$96.78(+1.57%)+$1.50Vanguard Index Funds - Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETFNYSEMKT: VBK$307.19(+1.79%)+$5.41*Average returns of all recommendations since inception. Cost basis and return based on previous market day close.

Read Original

Source Information

Source: The Motley Fool

Discussion

0 professional contributions

Sign in to join this professional discussion.

Be the first to add a constructive contribution.