Back to News
investment

Silver vs. Gold: Is SIL or IAU the Stronger Precious Metals ETF Right Now?

newsfeedback@fool.com (Katie Brockman)
Loading...
4 min read
0 likes
⚡ Quantum Brief
The iShares Gold Trust (IAU) offers direct physical gold exposure with a 0.25% expense ratio, $70.5B AUM, and 21 years of operation, making it a low-cost, liquid choice for investors seeking pure commodity exposure. Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) delivered a 161.9% one-year return but carries higher risk, with a 55.79% max drawdown and 0.65% expense ratio, reflecting its focus on volatile silver mining stocks rather than physical silver. IAU’s stability is evident in its 0.19 beta and -21.82% max drawdown, contrasting SIL’s 1.22 beta and steeper losses, highlighting IAU’s appeal for risk-averse investors during market turbulence. SIL provides a 1.11% dividend yield, appealing to income-focused investors, while IAU’s lack of dividends reflects its pure gold-tracking structure without company-specific risks or sector biases. Over five years, $1,000 in IAU grew to $2,701 versus SIL’s $2,373, underscoring IAU’s long-term resilience despite SIL’s recent outperformance, driven by silver’s cyclical volatility and equity market sensitivity.
AI Audio Summary
0:00 / 0:00
Click to play
7324336a-a9e8-4a04-a1d0-da740cf7a617.jpeg
Quantum News · Media Library

By Katie Brockman – Apr 10, 2026 at 9:00PM ESTKey PointsIAU carries a much lower expense ratio and is far larger and more liquid than SIL.SIL has delivered a much higher one-year return, but it's also experienced a more severe max drawdown.SIL is concentrated in silver mining stocks, while IAU offers direct gold exposure without underlying company risk.The Global X - Silver Miners ETF (SIL +1.04%) and the iShares Gold Trust (IAU 0.18%) both provide access to precious metals, but their approaches and risk profiles differ. SIL holds a portfolio of silver mining companies, giving investors indirect exposure to silver prices with added company-specific risk. IAU, on the other hand, is designed to track the price of physical gold, offering a more direct commodity play. This comparison unpacks the nuances between these two popular ETFs.Snapshot (cost & size)MetricSILIAUIssuerGlobal XiSharesExpense ratio0.65%0.25%1-yr return (as of April 10, 2026)161.9%53.7%Beta (5Y monthly)1.220.19Assets under management (AUM)$5.13 billion$70.5 billionDividend yield1.11%N/ABeta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from five-year monthly returns. The 1-yr return represents total return over the trailing 12 months.IAU stands out as the more affordable option, charging a lower expense ratio. This cost gap could matter for long-term holders, especially given IAU’s much larger scale and liquidity. Also, while IAU doesn’t offer a dividend, SIL does — which could be appealing to income-focused investors.Performance & risk comparisonMetricSILIAUMax drawdown (5Y)-55.79%-21.82%Growth of $1,000 over 5 years (total returns)$2,373$2,701What's insideIAU offers exposure to the price of physical gold, holding gold bullion in trust for shareholders. With over 21 years in operation, it is one of the oldest and largest gold ETFs, managing over $70 billion in assets. IAU’s portfolio consists entirely of gold, so investors avoid company-specific risks or sector tilts. The fund’s structure means performance closely mirrors spot gold prices, and it remains highly liquid with tight trading spreads.By contrast, SIL invests in a basket of 38 silver mining companies, providing equity exposure to the silver industry. Its top holdings include Wheaton Precious Metals, Pan American Silver, and Coeur Mining.SIL’s 100% basic materials tilt amplifies its exposure to the commodities cycle, and its returns may diverge from spot silver due to these equity factors.For more guidance on ETF investing, check out the full guide at this link.What this means for investorsGold and silver can both be solid investments during periods of economic uncertainty, but these two ETFs differ significantly in performance and risk.Silver has been more volatile in recent years. Its higher beta suggests more severe price fluctuations, and its steeper max drawdown indicates deeper downturns during its rough patches. Over the last 12 months, however, SIL has outperformed IAU with total returns of nearly 162% compared to around 54%.One caveat to consider, though, is that SIL doesn’t just track the price of physical silver the way IAU does with gold. Its focus on silver mining companies can make it more sensitive to broader market swings and to the performance of those specific companies.This can add a layer of risk and reward with SIL. Many investors seeking exposure to precious metals are looking to move away from the equity market, so SIL may carry more risk than some investors would prefer. The upside, though, is increased earning potential. Unlike IAU, SIL also offers dividend payments, which can provide a somewhat more stable source of long-term passive income.Read NextApr 3, 2026 •By Sarah SidlowGold Prices Are on the Move: Is GLD or IAU the Better ETF Pick?Apr 10, 2026 •By Emma NewberyStock Market Today, April 10: Markets Flat as Investors Watch Iran Peace NegotiationsApr 10, 2026 •By James BrumleyGrowth vs. Value: Which Side of the Trade Is Winning Right Now?Apr 10, 2026 •By Adam SpataccoHere's Why Buying This Vanguard Index Fund Today Could Be the Best Financial Decision You Ever MakeApr 10, 2026 •By Anders BylundWhy Market Indexes Aren't Panicking TodayAbout the AuthorKatie Brockman is a contributing writer at The Motley Fool covering retirement, Social Security, and investing fundamentals. Prior to The Motley Fool, Katie held various writing and editing roles at companies ranging from small start-ups to multimillion-dollar brands. Her work has appeared in USA Today, Inc magazine, and other authoritative media outlets. She holds a bachelor’s degree in business administration and management from Illinois Wesleyan University.TMFKatieBrockmanStocks MentionediShares Gold TrustNYSEMKT: IAU$89.56(-0.18%)-$0.16Global X Funds - Global X Silver Miners ETFNYSEMKT: SIL$96.66(+1.04%)+$1.00*Average returns of all recommendations since inception. Cost basis and return based on previous market day close.

Read Original

Tags

government-funding

Source Information

Source: The Motley Fool

Discussion

0 professional contributions

Sign in to join this professional discussion.

Be the first to add a constructive contribution.