Shareholders Cannot Afford to Allow Chairman David Goebel to Remain as a Director at Jack in the Box – Asserts Biglari Capital

Author of the article:You can save this article by registering for free here. Or sign-in if you have an account.This Campaign Is About David Goebel’s 17-Year Record of FailureSubscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.SAN ANTONIO, Feb. 13, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Biglari Capital Corp. (“Biglari Capital”), the largest shareholder of Jack in the Box Inc. (NasdaqGS: JACK), with a 9.86% ownership stake, today issued the following statement in response to JACK’s latest shareholder letter:David Goebel’s 17 Years of Failure Cannot Be Disguised as “Expertise”Chairman Goebel’s “Expertise” Has Been a Shield for EntrenchmentGet the latest headlines, breaking news and columns.By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder.The next issue of Top Stories will soon be in your inbox.We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try againInterested in more newsletters? Browse here.The reality is that by repeatedly invoking his credentials as a restaurant expert, Mr. Goebel has maintained tight control over the Board and exerted significant influence on JACK’s strategy. A Board largely comprising long-tenured directors with no restaurant expertise became heavily reliant on Mr. Goebel’s advice — and the results speak for themselves:1Relying on David Goebel’s Outdated and Unproductive Experience Has Brought JACK to the BrinkJACK’s latest shareholder letter confirms our view: Both the Board and management are beholden to Mr. Goebel’s outdated experience at Applebee’s — which he left nearly two decades ago — and his franchisee experience from almost three decades ago. Reliance on such dated expertise is precisely what has brought JACK to its current precarious position, where it has been forced to suspend dividends, close 150–200 stores, and restructure the business to remain solvent. This predicament is primarily the result of David Goebel’s Board influence and poor decisions.We Can Conclude that David Goebel Lacks IntegrityIn addition to the chairman’s 17-year failed record, Mr. Goebel has resorted to fabricating stories about Mr. Biglari, saying that he used “abusive” and “threatening” language. In fact, Mr. Biglari told Mr. Goebel that because of the company’s poor performance, Mr. Biglari would in all likelihood launch a proxy contest, with Mr. Goebel as its likely target. The language of this statement was direct and factual. In addition to his lack of relevant restaurant turnaround experience, Mr. Goebel is apparently also unable to recognize the use of common metaphors. Mr. Biglari warned Mr. Goebel that proxy fights usually leave disputing parties bloodied, given their inherently contentious nature.Biglari Capital just released email correspondence between it and JACK. It refutes another fabricated story about Mr. Biglari being a “no show” to a meeting. It also demonstrates the approach Biglari Capital took to try to develop a productive relationship with the chairman, and the tone of the messages sent. See presentation here. (www.saratogaproxy.com/JACK)The perversion of the chairman twisting facts into lies about Mr. Biglari is another reason Mr. Goebel is unfit to be a director, much less the leader of the Board. We urge shareholders not to be fooled by these false and misleading claims. Mr. Biglari is NOT on the ballot for election to the Board. Chairman Goebel is attempting to divert shareholders’ attention from the issue at hand: the fact that this election is a referendum on his 17 years of failed leadership.One More Year of David Goebel’s Influence Poses Massive RiskIf Mr. Goebel remains on the Board for one more year, his dated ideas and misguided influence could further damage JACK’s brand and deteriorate an already untenable financial situation. With short interest accounting for over 30% of the float,2 it is clear that the market has no confidence in the current Board.One more year of Mr. Goebel’s influence could push the company into financial distress from which it may be difficult to return.It Is Time to Free JACK from David Goebel’s Damaging InfluenceThere is simply no reason to trust that David Goebel can do anything different. He has had 17 years to prove himself, and he has failed. It is time to hold him accountable, give the Board an opportunity to undo the damage, and ensure more constructive and robust discussion between the Board and the management team.We urge ALL shareholders to VOTE AGAINST the re-election of David Goebel at the upcoming annual meeting.If you have already voted your shares, you can still change your vote. Only your last dated vote counts.Source: Biglari Capital‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾1 Source: Biglari Capital presentations dated February 09, 2026, and February 06, 2026.2 Source: FactSet data as of February 11, 2026Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion. Please keep comments relevant and respectful. Comments may take up to an hour to appear on the site. You will receive an email if there is a reply to your comment, an update to a thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information.