Back to News
investment

Oil fears hit Asian stocks harder than profits

Financial Times Asia
Loading...
6 min read
0 likes
⚡ Quantum Brief
Geopolitical strikes on Iran triggered extreme volatility in Asian markets, with South Korea’s Kospi index plunging 19% over two days before rebounding 10%—its sharpest rally since 2008. South Korea and Japan, heavily reliant on Middle Eastern oil imports, face acute exposure: a $10 oil price hike adds $10 billion to South Korea’s annual crude bill, now surging past $100 per barrel. While energy costs spiked, most Asian blue-chip firms—like chipmakers and automakers—remain indirectly affected, with energy comprising just ~10% of operating costs for sectors like electronics and machinery. Chipmakers, dominating 40% of Korea’s market, depend more on global demand and electricity than crude, limiting direct oil price impact despite their energy-intensive operations. Markets overreacted to worst-case supply disruption fears; unless oil stays elevated, earnings hits for exporters like Toyota and Samsung may prove less severe than the sell-off suggests.
AI Audio Summary
0:00 / 0:00
Click to play
Untitled design (20).png
Quantum News · Media Library

Steep drops in Korea’s benchmark Kospi index that have followed strikes on Iran reflect the fact that the country has one of the world’s most energy import-dependent economies © AFP via Getty ImagesOil fears hit Asian stocks harder than profits on x (opens in a new window)Oil fears hit Asian stocks harder than profits on facebook (opens in a new window)Oil fears hit Asian stocks harder than profits on linkedin (opens in a new window)Oil fears hit Asian stocks harder than profits on whatsapp (opens in a new window) Save Oil fears hit Asian stocks harder than profits on x (opens in a new window)Oil fears hit Asian stocks harder than profits on facebook (opens in a new window)Oil fears hit Asian stocks harder than profits on linkedin (opens in a new window)Oil fears hit Asian stocks harder than profits on whatsapp (opens in a new window) Save PublishedMarch 11 2026Jump to comments sectionPrint this pageUnlock the Editor’s Digest for freeRoula Khalaf, Editor of the FT, selects her favourite stories in this weekly newsletter.Daily swings of 10 per cent are rare for a national stock index. Yet over the past week such volatility has become a recurring feature of Asian markets. Strikes on Iran were immediately followed by a 7 per cent drop in Korea’s benchmark Kospi index, then another 12 per cent the next day, while Japan’s Nikkei 225 also fell. A day later, the Kospi index rose 10 per cent, its strongest rally since the global financial crisis. That early reaction reflects the fact that both Korea and Japan are among the world’s most energy import-dependent economies. Neither have meaningful local oil resources and both rely heavily on crude shipped from the Middle East. South Korea imports about 1bn barrels a year, meaning each $10 increase in global oil prices raises the country’s annual crude import bill by around $10bn. Crude prices surpassed the $100 mark on Monday, up from $72 before the strikes. It makes sense that when conflict erupts in the region, investors are quick to price in the possibility of higher energy costs. But the direct impact of higher oil prices on listed companies is less straightforward. Across most local sectors, with the exception of airlines, shipping and petrochemicals, energy accounts for only a modest share of total operating costs. Industries such as electronics and machinery, which account for the largest chunk of Korean and Japanese markets, have lower direct oil exposure. Chipmakers and electronics group costs are tied closely to capital equipment and raw materials.Chipmakers, which account for about 40 per cent of the Kospi’s total market value, are energy intensive in terms of electricity consumption but less exposed to crude oil prices directly and margins are driven by global chip demand and pricing. Assuming energy accounted for about 10 per cent of operating costs, a 25 per cent rise in oil prices would increase overall costs by 2.5 per cent.The Japanese market is similar in that its largest companies are exporters and are less directly affected by oil prices. Automakers and industrial machinery makers like Toyota and Komatsu derive much of their earnings from overseas sales, meaning their fortunes are tied more closely to global manufacturing demand than to energy costs.The reaction in the past week reflects the possibility of a sustained supply disruption and a prolonged surge in crude prices. Unless those worst-case scenarios materialise, the earnings impact on many blue-chip companies in Asia is likely to be less severe than the sell-off suggests.june.yoon@ft.comReuse this content (opens in new window) CommentsJump to comments section Follow the topics in this article Lex Add to myFT Oil & Gas industry Add to myFT Equities Add to myFT Japan Add to myFT South Korea Add to myFT CommentsDaily swings of 10 per cent are rare for a national stock index. Yet over the past week such volatility has become a recurring feature of Asian markets. Strikes on Iran were immediately followed by a 7 per cent drop in Korea’s benchmark Kospi index, then another 12 per cent the next day, while Japan’s Nikkei 225 also fell. A day later, the Kospi index rose 10 per cent, its strongest rally since the global financial crisis. That early reaction reflects the fact that both Korea and Japan are among the world’s most energy import-dependent economies. Neither have meaningful local oil resources and both rely heavily on crude shipped from the Middle East. South Korea imports about 1bn barrels a year, meaning each $10 increase in global oil prices raises the country’s annual crude import bill by around $10bn. Crude prices surpassed the $100 mark on Monday, up from $72 before the strikes. It makes sense that when conflict erupts in the region, investors are quick to price in the possibility of higher energy costs. But the direct impact of higher oil prices on listed companies is less straightforward. Across most local sectors, with the exception of airlines, shipping and petrochemicals, energy accounts for only a modest share of total operating costs. Industries such as electronics and machinery, which account for the largest chunk of Korean and Japanese markets, have lower direct oil exposure. Chipmakers and electronics group costs are tied closely to capital equipment and raw materials.Chipmakers, which account for about 40 per cent of the Kospi’s total market value, are energy intensive in terms of electricity consumption but less exposed to crude oil prices directly and margins are driven by global chip demand and pricing. Assuming energy accounted for about 10 per cent of operating costs, a 25 per cent rise in oil prices would increase overall costs by 2.5 per cent.The Japanese market is similar in that its largest companies are exporters and are less directly affected by oil prices. Automakers and industrial machinery makers like Toyota and Komatsu derive much of their earnings from overseas sales, meaning their fortunes are tied more closely to global manufacturing demand than to energy costs.The reaction in the past week reflects the possibility of a sustained supply disruption and a prolonged surge in crude prices. Unless those worst-case scenarios materialise, the earnings impact on many blue-chip companies in Asia is likely to be less severe than the sell-off suggests.june.yoon@ft.com

Read Original

Tags

energy-climate

Source Information

Source: Financial Times Asia

Discussion

0 professional contributions

Sign in to join this professional discussion.

Be the first to add a constructive contribution.