Back to News
investment

Judge tosses Trump's lawsuit against Rupert Murdoch over Epstein birthday letter

Jacob Shamsian
Loading...
4 min read
0 likes
⚡ Quantum Brief
A Florida federal judge dismissed Donald Trump’s $10 billion defamation lawsuit against Rupert Murdoch and The Wall Street Journal over a 2003 birthday letter to Jeffrey Epstein, ruling the article wasn’t defamatory. The lawsuit centered on a "bawdy" letter allegedly signed by Trump, featuring a nude outline, included in a book for Epstein’s 50th birthday. Trump denied its authenticity but lost on procedural grounds. Judge Darrin Gayles found the Journal’s reporting met journalistic standards, noting it sought comment from the White House, FBI, and DOJ, rejecting Trump’s claim of deliberate negligence. Trump’s team vowed to refile the case, calling it a "powerhouse lawsuit" against "Fake News," while Murdoch, 95, avoids deposition for now after a prior legal delay. The ruling hinged on defamation law’s high bar for public figures, not the letter’s validity—leaving Trump’s legal strategy in question as he pursues a second attempt.
AI Audio Summary
0:00 / 0:00
Click to play
Judge tosses Trump's lawsuit against Rupert Murdoch over Epstein birthday letter

President Donald Trump on April 6, 2026 Brendan SMIALOWSKI / AFP via Getty Images 2026-04-13T15:11:00.262Z Share Copy link Email Facebook WhatsApp X LinkedIn Bluesky Threads lighning bolt icon An icon in the shape of a lightning bolt.

Impact Link Save Saved Read in app This story is available exclusively to Business Insider subscribers. Become an Insider and start reading now. Have an account? Log in. A judge dismissed Trump's lawsuit against Rupert Murdoch. Trump alleged a Wall Street Journal story about a letter to Jeffrey Epstein was defamatory. Trump plans to refile the lawsuit, a spokesperson said. AI-generated summary Summaries are generated by an AI model trained on Business Insider's articles. AI may make mistakes or provide inaccurate/incomplete information. We're unable to load that answer right now. Please try again. What are the implications of lawsuit refiling? What is Rupert Murdoch's role in News Corp.? What was the Wall Street Journal's response? How does defamation law work in the US? How might this ruling impact Trump's strategy? A federal judge in Florida handed Donald Trump a setback in court Monday, tossing his lawsuit against Rupert Murdoch over a Wall Street Journal article about the president's relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. Loading audio narration... US District Judge Darrin Gayles ruled that the paper's story, published last year about a 2003 birthday letter Trump sent to Jeffrey Epstein, was not defamatory.In July, the Journal published a story about a book of letters to Epstein, who later pleaded guilty to sex offenses and died in jail in 2019 while awaiting trial on more severe sex-trafficking charges. A letter bearing Trump's name was included in the book compiled for Epstein's 50th birthday. The letter was "bawdy" and featured an outline of a nude woman, the Journal reported at the time.Trump's lawsuit, filed in July, said the letter was not real. He sued Murdoch and a group of Journal reporters personally and asked for $10 billion in damages.

The House Oversight Committee released a copy of the birthday book, with some redactions, in October, after obtaining it from Epstein's estate with a subpoena.The copy included the letter with Trump's name. "A pal is a wonderful thing," the letter read. "Happy Birthday — and may every day be another wonderful secret."US District Judge Darrin Gayles, an Obama appointee, wrote in his Monday ruling that he did not consider the committee's release of the full birthday book while evaluating whether to toss the lawsuit. The litigation had not yet reached the appropriate stage to evaluate the book's fidelity, the judge said. The judge ruled that, even without the full copy of the book backing up the Wall Street Journal's reporter, Trump's allegation failed to meet the legal standard for arguing that the Journal tried to defame him. The Journal reached out to The White House, the FBI, and the Justice Department for comment, and so it did not deliberately avoid investigating the veracity of the book, as Trump had alleged, the judge ruled.A spokesperson for Trump's legal team said the president would refile the lawsuit. "President Trump will follow Judge Gayles's ruling and guidance to refile this powerhouse lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal and all of the other Defendants," the spokesperson said. "The President will continue to hold accountable those who traffic in Fake News to mislead the American People."The lawsuit's dismissal, for now, means that Murdoch — the chairman emeritus of News Corp., the parent company of Dow Jones, which publishes The Wall Street Journal — can avoid being deposed in the case. Trump previously attempted to accelerate the case's timeline and force Murdoch to sit for a deposition. They later struck a deal where the 95-year-old media mogul could stave off questioning while the judge considered whether to dismiss the case.A spokesperson for News Corp. didn't immediately respond to Business Insider's request for comment.

Read Original

Tags

government-funding

Source Information

Source: Business Insider

Discussion

0 professional contributions

Sign in to join this professional discussion.

Be the first to add a constructive contribution.