Back to News
investment

HSBC board earns almost £1mn more despite botched chair search

Financial Times
Loading...
5 min read
0 likes
⚡ Quantum Brief
HSBC’s non-executive directors received £6.3mn in 2025 fees—a 16% increase—despite shareholder criticism over the prolonged, chaotic search to replace former chair Sir Mark Tucker, who left abruptly in September 2025. The seven-month process, marred by internal disputes, ended with interim chair Brendan Nelson’s permanent appointment in December, surprising investors due to his lack of Asian experience—a key region for HSBC’s profits. Ann Godbehere, who led the search, saw her fees nearly double to £737,000 before retiring in December, leaving HSBC to find replacements for her and the audit committee chair role Nelson temporarily holds. Shareholders expressed frustration over the "haphazard" search, demanding a more proactive approach for future leadership transitions, as the bank’s governance practices face scrutiny under UK corporate rules. HSBC defended the fee hikes as aligned with shareholder-approved policies but declined to address investor concerns about the chair succession process.
AI Audio Summary
0:00 / 0:00
Click to play
christian-wiediger-c3ZWXOv1Ndc-unsplash.jpg
Quantum News · Media Library

Corporate governanceAdd to myFTGet instant alerts for this topicManage your delivery channels hereRemove from myFTHSBC board earns almost £1mn more despite botched chair search Fees for non-executive directors increased even as shareholders criticise succession processHSBC said in December that Brendan Nelson’s appointment was made after a ‘robust process’ that looked at internal and external candidates © Bob Henry/UCG/Universal Images Group/Getty ImagesHSBC board earns almost £1mn more despite botched chair search on x (opens in a new window)HSBC board earns almost £1mn more despite botched chair search on facebook (opens in a new window)HSBC board earns almost £1mn more despite botched chair search on linkedin (opens in a new window)HSBC board earns almost £1mn more despite botched chair search on whatsapp (opens in a new window) Save HSBC board earns almost £1mn more despite botched chair search on x (opens in a new window)HSBC board earns almost £1mn more despite botched chair search on facebook (opens in a new window)HSBC board earns almost £1mn more despite botched chair search on linkedin (opens in a new window)HSBC board earns almost £1mn more despite botched chair search on whatsapp (opens in a new window) Save Ortenca Aliaj, Emma Dunkley and Anjli Raval in LondonPublishedFebruary 26 2026Jump to comments sectionPrint this pageUnlock the Editor’s Digest for freeRoula Khalaf, Editor of the FT, selects her favourite stories in this weekly newsletter.HSBC fees for non-executive directors have increased by almost £1mn, even as they face mounting criticism over the search to replace Sir Mark Tucker after his early departure left the chair role vacant for months. Europe’s largest lender paid £6.3mn in fees and benefits to non-executive directors in 2025, up 16 per cent from the previous year, after HSBC raised pay to reflect the amount of time and work board members dedicate to the bank. The rise in fees comes at an uncomfortable time for the board, which oversaw a chaotic seven-month search to find a replacement for Tucker. The process — which featured infighting over the desired attributes of the ideal candidate and considered former chancellor George Osborne and ex-Goldman Sachs banker Kevin Sneader — ended in the appointment of interim chair Brendan Nelson to the full-time role in December. The decision surprised the banking industry and employees given Nelson’s lack of experience in Asia; long seen as a deal-breaker for a bank that generates most of its profits in the region. Nelson had also formerly expressed reluctance to serve a full term. Ann Godbehere, the senior independent director who led the search, saw her fees almost double last year to £737,000, according to the bank’s annual report released on Wednesday. That amount included an increase in compensation for being a member of several group committees at the bank, including remuneration and governance. Godbehere, who joined HSBC’s board in 2023, retired in December shortly after Nelson was named chair. The bank is searching for a senior independent director to replace her. It is also looking for a new chair of the group audit committee, which is currently held by Nelson. HSBC disclosed in its annual report that Nelson’s dual roles fall foul of the UK corporate governance code but that he will do both until a successor has been found to chair the audit committee “to provide continuity of oversight”. Some HSBC investors have expressed frustration at the haphazard way the bank handled the search for the crucial position. “We were very disappointed to see the outcome of the chair search, given how long [it took] and how much notice there was that this was going to happen,” said one HSBC top 20 shareholder. “So in our conversations with the company we have expressed our frustration.”Another shareholder acknowledged that there had been “issues” with finding a replacement for Tucker but said it is clear HSBC needs a chair who can serve the necessary six to nine-year term and push forward the bank’s growth agenda in Hong Kong and China. HSBC said in December that Nelson’s appointment was made after a “robust process” that looked at internal and external candidates. “Fees are in line with the directors’ remuneration policy approved by the shareholders at the 2025 AGM,” said an HSBC spokesperson. The bank declined to comment on shareholder frustration at the chair replacement process.Though HSBC had less time than expected to find a replacement for Tucker — he abruptly announced he would leave in September last year though his tenure would not come to an end until September 2026 — people involved in the search said the bank had been too slow.Investors said the bank should run a more “proactive process” this time that allows it to be able to strike if the right candidate comes along. The top 20 shareholder said: “Frankly it’s not acceptable that you’re not able to manage this kind of thing.” Reuse this content (opens in new window) CommentsJump to comments section Follow the topics in this article Corporate governance Add to myFT UK banks Add to myFT UK companies Add to myFT Financial services Add to myFT Companies Add to myFT Comments

Read Original

Tags

partnership

Source Information

Source: Financial Times

Discussion

0 professional contributions

Sign in to join this professional discussion.

Be the first to add a constructive contribution.