Global Climate ETF or Emerging Markets: Which Has Better Returns?

By Dave Kovaleski – Mar 27, 2026 at 2:21PM ESTKey PointsThe iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (NYSEMKT:EEM) charges a higher expense ratio but has delivered a stronger one-year return than the State Street SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NASDAQ:NZAC). NZAC offers a climate-focused, ESG-screened global portfolio, while EEM targets only emerging markets with a tech and financials tilt.EEM is far larger and more liquid, but its risk profile includes a deeper historical drawdown.The State Street SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC 1.37%) and the iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM 0.70%) differ most in geographic focus, expense ratio, and risk profile—NZAC is a climate-conscious global fund, while EEM concentrates on emerging markets and carries higher costs and volatility.Both NZAC and EEM seek to provide broad equity exposure, but with distinct approaches: NZAC blends developed and emerging markets with an ESG overlay, while EEM zeroes in on large- and mid-cap stocks from emerging economies. This comparison highlights how cost, performance, risk, holdings, and portfolio makeup may influence investor preference between these two ETFs.Snapshot (cost & size)MetricNZACEEMIssuerSPDRISharesExpense ratio0.12%0.72%1-yr return (as of 2026-03-24)11.2%26.2%Dividend yield2.0%2.1%Beta0.940.66AUM$161.8 million$25.3 billionBeta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from five-year monthly returns. The 1-yr return represents total return over the trailing 12 months.EEM comes with a much higher annual fee than NZAC, but it also offers a slightly higher dividend yield. For cost-conscious investors, NZAC may look more affordable, while EEM appeals to those prioritizing yield and exposure to emerging markets.Performance & risk comparisonMetricNZACEEMMax drawdown (5 y)-28.31%-37.82%Growth of $1,000 over 5 years$1,376$1,089What's insideEEM focuses exclusively on emerging markets, holding 1,223 stocks with a heavy allocation to technology (34%) and financial services (19%), and a noticeable presence in consumer cyclicals (9%). Its top holdings include Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (2330.TW), Samsung Electronics Ltd (005930.KS), and Tencent Holdings Ltd (0700.HK), making it heavily tilted toward Asian tech giants. EEM has a 23-year track record and deep liquidity, but does not apply ESG screens or climate mandates.In contrast, NZAC tracks a climate-aligned version of the MSCI ACWI index, blending developed and emerging markets with an ESG screen that aims to reduce climate risks and capture sustainable opportunities. Its portfolio is led by Nvidia Corp (NVDA 1.95%), Apple Inc (AAPL 1.58%), and Microsoft Corp (MSFT 1.96%), with technology, cash & others, and financial services as the top sectors. This focus may appeal to investors seeking a global, climate-conscious approach with broad diversification.For more guidance on ETF investing, check out the full guide at this link.What this means for investorsThese two ETFs are both solid options for investors looking to diversify internationally and into emerging markets. International and emerging market stocks have outperformed their U.S. counterparts over the past year, and that outperformance is expected to continue as investors rotate out of overvalued U.S. large-cap stocks into other investment types to better diversify their portfolios. If you are a climate-conscious investor, the State Street ETF would likely be the preferred choice. But even if you are just looking for the best returns, you may want to opt for the State Street ETF. It holds fewer stocks than the iShares option, about 673, but it is still well-diversified with stocks from more than 40 countries represented. But the most, about 64%, are from the U.S. Further, roughly 31% of the portfolio is in tech stocks, while 17% is in financials. Nvidia (NVDA 1.95%), Apple (AAPL 1.58%), and Microsoft (MSFT 1.96%) are the three largest holdings. The iShares ETF has far outperformed the State Street ETF over the past 12 months, with a return of 24% to 9% for the State Street ETF. But the State Street fund owns the edge over the three-, five-, and 10-year periods. Read NextMar 27, 2026 •By Jake LerchInternational ETFs: EEM and IEFA Offer Distinct Global ETF ChoicesMar 27, 2026 •By Jake LerchEEM vs. SPGM: EEM Delivers Higher Returns but Costs More Than SPGMMar 26, 2026 •By Jake LerchEmerging Market Showdown: IEMG Offers Lower Fees Compared to EEMMar 26, 2026 •By Sarah SidlowEEM Offers Focused Growth While IXUS Provides Broad SafetyMar 26, 2026 •By Jake LerchEmerging Markets ETFs: EEM Boasts Higher Returns, SCHE Has Lower FeesMar 13, 2026 •By Keith NoonanBest International Stocks to Buy in 2026: Are They Right for Your Portfolio?About the AuthorDave mainly covers financials, consumer goods, and technology stocks and ETFs. He wrote for the Fool from 2019-2023 and rejoined the Fool in 2026. In the past he's covered mutual funds and institutional investments for Pensions & Investments, personal finance for S&P, money markets and bonds for Crane Data, and stocks for ValueWalk.TMFdkovaleskiStocks MentionediShares - iShares Msci Emerging Markets ETFNYSEMKT: EEM$55.09(-0.69%)-$0.39SPDR Index Shares Funds - State Street SPDR Msci Acwi Climate Paris Aligned ETFNASDAQ: NZAC$39.56(-1.37%)-$0.55*Average returns of all recommendations since inception. Cost basis and return based on previous market day close.