Back to News
investment

General Dynamics Lands a $15.4 Billion Navy Contract

newsfeedback@fool.com (Rich Smith)
Loading...
6 min read
0 likes
⚡ Quantum Brief
The U.S. Navy awarded General Dynamics a $15.4 billion contract for Columbia-class nuclear submarines, part of a $126 billion program to replace aging Ohio-class vessels. General Dynamics will receive 78% of the total program funds, with Huntington Ingalls handling the remaining 22% for bow and stern construction. The first submarine, USS District of Columbia, begins delivery in 2027 but won’t be operational until 2031, marking a 15-year development timeline. Funds will support design, shipyard upgrades, and supplier development for serial production, ensuring long-term industrial capacity for both Columbia and Virginia-class submarines. Despite General Dynamics’ larger role, Huntington Ingalls may offer better investment value due to faster earnings growth and stronger cash flow metrics.
AI Audio Summary
0:00 / 0:00
Click to play
generated-image (58).png
Quantum News · Media Library

By Rich Smith – Mar 29, 2026 at 5:05AM ESTKey PointsThe U.S. Navy just awarded General Dynamics $15.4 billion to support construction of 12 nuclear submarines.The total cost of the project may exceed $126 billion, with General Dynamics getting 78% of the money.The other 22% would go to Huntington Ingalls.No one has ever accused the U.S. Navy of moving too fast. It's been nearly 10 years since the Navy announced it would build a new fleet of 12 nuclear-powered, nuclear ballistic missile-armed Columbia-class submarines to replace its aging Ohio-class boats. It was three more years before the first steel was cut, and six years since the first keel was laid. It will be 2027 before the first boat is actually delivered, and it could be as late as 2031 before it's operationally ready -- 15 years, start to finish. That doesn't mean the money isn't already flowing, however. Image source: U.S. Navy. $15.4 billion for 12 boats In 2017, the Navy awarded prime contractor General Dynamics (GD 2.39%) a $5.1 billion contract to begin designing the first Columbia-class vessel, USS District of Columbia. Three years later, GD received another $9.5 billion award to begin building the boat. Even with District of Columbia perhaps five years from full operational capability, however, the Navy agreed last week to award General Dynamics another $15.4 billion, "for additional Columbia-class ballistic missile submarines design, class lead yard support and sustainment, integrated enterprise plan initiatives for the class, and submarine industrial base supplier development enhancement efforts to support Columbia-class ballistic missile submarine program execution." It seems the Navy is confident enough that the program is on track that it's already making preparations to begin serial production. ExpandNYSE: GDGeneral DynamicsToday's Change(-2.39%) $-8.49Current Price$346.79Key Data PointsMarket Cap$94BDay's Range$345.70 - $354.2552wk Range$239.20 - $369.70Volume64KAvg Vol1.4MGross Margin15.13%Dividend Yield1.73% According to an announcement on the Department of Defense contracts page, the $15.4 billion will cover development costs through June 2035. Upgrades to shipyards will also support the construction of additional Virginia-class fast-attack submarines, or SSNs. $154 billion... and a little bit more That's just the cost for getting ready to build the boats, however. According to the Government Accountability Office, the total program cost for building all 12 planned Columbia-class SSBNs will run to $126.5 billion, resulting in a cost per hull of $10.5 billion. Not all of that will go to General Dynamics -- but most of it will.

As General Dynamics points out, its competitor-collaborator Huntington Ingalls (HII 0.81%) will be building the bow and stern portions of the Columbia-class submarines, but General Dynamics will be responsible for building 78% of each Columbia-class boat. There's also the possibility that the Navy would build one or more additional non-nuclear missile-armed guided-missile submarines (SSGNs) based on the Columbia design, to replace the four Ohio-class SSBNs that were converted into SSGNs. Government weapons contracts are notoriously subject to change, of course -- both to the downside when they are abruptly cut short and canceled, and also to the upside as costs run over budget. Assuming the Columbia-class program runs as expected, however, it sounds like General Dynamics can expect to collect at least $99 billion over the life of the construction project, with the remaining $27 billion or so going to Huntington Ingalls. But does this make General Dynamics the better defense stock to invest in? Not necessarily. General Dynamics stock or Huntington Ingalls: Which is the better buy? Consider that at a share price of more than 22 times trailing earnings, but a long-term forecast earnings growth rate of only 10.5%, General Dynamics stock sells for a PEG ratio of more than 2.0 -- roughly twice the ideal valuation for a value investor. Valued on earnings, rival and Columbia-class-partner Huntington appears more expensive than General Dynamics at first glance, selling for 25.7 times trailing earnings. However, as a near pure-play on shipbuilding, Huntington Ingalls is better positioned to profit from the Trump Administration's efforts to bulk up the U.S. Navy by building the Columbia-class and other new warships, such as guided-missile battleships. Analysts polled by S&P Global Market Intelligence forecast that over the next five years, Huntington Ingalls will average a 14% earnings growth rate -- giving it a PEG ratio of only 1.8. Final point: Whereas General Dynamics generates weaker free cash flow than it reports as net income, Huntington Ingalls' trailing free cash flow of $794 million is 31% ahead of its reported net income of $605 million. (Which is to say, Huntington generates more cash profit than it claims as reported earnings.) This pushes Huntington's price-to-free cash flow ratio below 20. By this metric, Huntington Ingalls isn't just growing faster than General Dynamics stock. It's cheaper, too.Read NextMar 3, 2026 •By Lou WhitemanBest Defense Stocks to Buy in 2026 and How to Invest in ThemMar 29, 2026 •By Rich SmithJared Isaacman Has Big Plans for NASA.

Here Are Some of Them.Mar 29, 2026 •By Rich SmithWill President Trump Put a Railgun on a New Battleship? (And Who Will Build It If He Does?)Mar 28, 2026 •By James HalleyHere's What Investors Need to Know About AST SpaceMobile Stock's Recent PullbackMar 28, 2026 •By Rick OrfordWhat Investors Need to Know About Archer Aviation Stock's Recent PullbackMar 29, 2026 •By Micah ZimmermanOil Over $100, a War in the Middle East, and the Fed on Hold. Here's How to Protect Your Artificial Intelligence (AI) Portfolio in 2026.About the AuthorRich Smith is a contributing Motley Fool defense and stock market analyst covering publicly traded and emerging companies in defense, space, aerospace, and other sectors. Prior to The Motley Fool, Rich practiced international corporate law for Clifford Chance in Russia, and for the Russian-Ukrainian Legal Group in Moscow, Kyiv, and Washington, D.C. He holds a bachelor’s degree in international relations from the College of William & Mary, a law degree from the University of Baltimore, and a language certification from the International Institute of Russian Language & Culture in Tver, Russian Federation. The Globe and Mail once featured him as “one of the best stock pickers since 2009.”TMFDittyX@RichSmithFoolStocks MentionedGeneral DynamicsNYSE: GD$346.76(-2.40%)-$8.52Huntington Ingalls IndustriesNYSE: HII$381.66(-0.81%)-$3.13*Average returns of all recommendations since inception. Cost basis and return based on previous market day close.

Read Original

Tags

aerospace-defense
government-funding

Source Information

Source: The Motley Fool

Discussion

0 professional contributions

Sign in to join this professional discussion.

Be the first to add a constructive contribution.