Back to News
investment

GDX vs. SGDM: A $27 Billion Size Gap and a Concentration Difference Worth Noting

newsfeedback@fool.com (Seena Hassouna)
Loading...
4 min read
0 likes
⚡ Quantum Brief
Two gold miner ETFs—GDX ($28.2B AUM) and SGDM ($660M)—delivered nearly identical 107% 1-year returns but differ sharply in scale, with GDX holding 18 more companies. Both funds track gold miners with identical top holdings (Agnico Eagle, Barrick, Newmont) but diverge in concentration: GDX’s 57 stocks offer broader exposure, while SGDM’s 39-stock focus amplifies top-holding influence. SGDM edges GDX with a 0.9% dividend yield (vs. 0.7%) and marginally lower volatility (beta 0.59 vs. 0.71), appealing to income-focused investors despite near-identical 5-year drawdowns. Costs are nearly equal (0.50% vs. 0.51% expense ratios), but GDX’s liquidity advantage—$27.5B AUM gap—reduces slippage risk for large trades, a critical factor for institutional investors. GDX’s wider net captures more upside from mid-tier miners during gold rallies, while SGDM’s tighter focus may offer smoother performance in uncertain markets, though differences remain modest for most investors.
AI Audio Summary
0:00 / 0:00
Click to play
Untitled design (18).png
Quantum News · Media Library

By Seena Hassouna – Apr 2, 2026 at 8:42PM ESTKey PointsGDX has much higher assets under management than SGDMBoth ETFs delivered identical 1-year returns and share similar sector exposure, but GDX holds more companiesSGDM offers a slightly higher dividend yield and similar historical drawdownVanEck Gold Miners ETF (NYSEMKT:GDX) and Sprott Gold Miners ETF (NYSEMKT:SGDM) both focus on gold mining companies, but GDX stands out for its much larger size and broader holdings, while SGDM edges ahead on yield and historical risk metrics.Both SGDM and GDX provide exposure to gold miners, concentrating on companies that generate most of their revenue from gold mining activities. This comparison looks at their costs, recent performance, risk profile, portfolio makeup, and trading characteristics to help investors gauge which fund may fit different gold-focused strategies.Snapshot (cost & size)MetricSGDMGDXIssuerSprottVanEckExpense ratio0.50%0.51%1-yr return (as of 2026-04-02)107.7%106.5%Dividend yield0.9%0.7%Beta0.590.71AUM$660.4 million$28.2 billionBeta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from five-year monthly returns. The 1-yr return represents total return over the trailing 12 months.Costs are nearly identical between the two, with SGDM just edging out GDX on expense ratio. SGDM also pays a modestly higher dividend yield, which could appeal to investors seeking a slight income tilt alongside gold exposure.Performance & risk comparisonMetricSGDMGDXMax drawdown (5 y)-49.68%-49.79%Growth of $1,000 over 5 years$2,818$2,814What's insideGDX tracks a broad index of global gold miners, holding 57 companies as of nearly 20 years since launch. Its portfolio is fully allocated to basic materials, with large positions in Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd (TSX:AEM.TO), Newmont Corp (NEM +0.23%), and Barrick Mining Corp (TSX:ABX.TO). The fund’s scale and age contribute to deep daily trading liquidity and a wide selection of industry leaders.SGDM also focuses exclusively on gold miners, but with a more concentrated approach: it holds 39 stocks, all in the basic materials sector. Top holdings include Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd (TSX:AEM.TO), Barrick Mining Corp (TSX:ABX.TO), and Newmont Corp (NEM +0.23%). Both funds have similar sector tilts and top stocks, but SGDM’s smaller roster translates to a slightly different risk/reward profile.For more guidance on ETF investing, check out the full guide at this link.What this means for investorsWhen two funds hold the same top names in the same order, the differences that matter are underneath the surface. GDX and SGDM both lead with Agnico Eagle, Barrick, and Newmont — but what separates them is how much of the fund those names represent and how much room is left for smaller miners to move the needle. GDX spreads its bet across 57 companies. That means the giants anchor the fund but a meaningful slice of the portfolio is exposed to mid-tier and smaller miners, which can add volatility but also catch upside from companies earlier in their growth cycle. SGDM concentrates in 39 stocks, which effectively gives its top holdings more weight and reduces exposure to the smaller names that GDX carries further down the list.For most investors the practical difference is modest — these funds will move together in most market conditions. Where it shows up is in degree. When gold prices rise and sentiment toward miners improves broadly, GDX's wider net catches more of that momentum across the sector. When conditions are uncertain, SGDM's tighter focus on established leaders may provide a marginally smoother ride. GDX's $28 billion in assets dwarfs SGDM's $660 million — for trades in the low millions, that gap starts to matter in the form of wider spreads and potential price slippage. For typical retail investors it's a non-issue, but worth knowing if your position size ever grows significantly.Read NextApr 2, 2026 •By John BallardGDX vs. SLV: Which Metals ETF Should You Buy?Mar 27, 2026 •By Eric TrieGold Bullion or Gold Miners: Which Fits Your Portfolio Better? GDX vs AAAUMar 11, 2026 •By Matt DiLallo7 Best Gold ETFs for 2026: Should You Invest?Mar 10, 2026 •By Matt DiLalloBest Gold Stocks to Buy in 2026 and How to InvestApr 2, 2026 •By Seena HassounaVDC vs. IYK: Vanguard's Structural Advantage and IYK's Defensive TwistStocks MentionedVanEck ETF Trust - VanEck Gold Miners ETFNYSEMKT: GDX$94.59(-1.48%)-$1.42Sprott Funds Trust - Sprott Gold Miners ETFNYSEMKT: SGDM$78.58(-0.68%)-$0.54*Average returns of all recommendations since inception. Cost basis and return based on previous market day close.

Read Original

Source Information

Source: The Motley Fool

Discussion

0 professional contributions

Sign in to join this professional discussion.

Be the first to add a constructive contribution.