Back to News
investment

Emerging Market Showdown: IEMG Offers Lower Fees Compared to EEM

newsfeedback@fool.com (Jake Lerch)
Loading...
4 min read
0 likes
⚡ Quantum Brief
IEMG outperforms EEM in cost efficiency, charging a 0.09% expense ratio versus EEM’s 0.72%, saving investors $63 annually per $10,000 invested. IEMG holds 2,725 stocks—more than double EEM’s 1,223—by including small-caps, offering broader emerging market exposure with nearly identical sector allocations. EEM’s one-year return (26.2%) slightly edges IEMG’s (25.5%), but IEMG delivers stronger five-year risk-adjusted growth ($1,106 vs. $1,089 per $1,000 invested). IEMG provides a higher dividend yield (2.6%) compared to EEM’s 2.1%, alongside lower volatility, with a five-year max drawdown of 35.94% versus EEM’s 37.82%. Despite EEM’s liquidity and recent performance, IEMG’s lower fees, broader coverage, and superior long-term metrics make it the preferred choice for most investors.
AI Audio Summary
0:00 / 0:00
Click to play
Untitled design (31).png
Quantum News · Media Library

By Jake Lerch – Mar 26, 2026 at 9:09PM ESTKey PointsEEM charges a much higher expense ratio than IEMG for nearly identical sector exposure and performanceIEMG holds more than twice as many stocks, covering small-caps that EEM omitsEEM is highly liquid but its five-year risk-adjusted return trails IEMG’s, and its yield is slightly lowerThe iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG 3.33%) and the iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM 3.40%) both target emerging market equities, but IEMG covers a broader set of stocks at a far lower fee while EEM delivers similar performance with a narrower large- and mid-cap focus.Both IEMG and EEM aim to give investors exposure to emerging markets, but IEMG includes small-cap stocks and charges less than one-seventh the fee. This comparison highlights key differences in cost, portfolio breadth, risk, and recent returns to help investors decide which may better suit their needs.Snapshot (cost & size)MetricIEMGEEMIssuerISharesISharesExpense ratio0.09%0.72%1-yr return (as of Mar. 24, 2026)25.5%26.2%Dividend yield2.6%2.1%AUM$135.8 billion$25.2 billionBeta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from five-year monthly returns. The 1-yr return represents total return over the trailing 12 months.IEMG is notably more affordable with a 0.09% expense ratio compared to EEM’s 0.72%, and it also offers a higher dividend yield, paying out 2.6% versus EEM’s 2.1%.Performance & risk comparisonMetricIEMGEEMMax drawdown (5 y)(35.94%)(37.82%)Growth of $1,000 over 5 years$1,106$1,089What's insideEEM focuses on large- and mid-cap emerging market stocks, with 1,223 holdings as of its 23rd year. Technology is the largest sector at 34%, followed by financial services (19%) and consumer cyclicals (9%). Top holdings include Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (TSM 6.29%), Samsung Electronics Ltd (SSU 7.55%), and Tencent Holdings Ltd (TCEHY 2.52%), and there are no notable quirks or overlays.IEMG extends exposure to small-cap companies, holding 2,725 stocks in total. Its sector mix is nearly identical—technology (32%), financial services (19%), and consumer cyclicals (10%)—with the same leading positions in Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing, Samsung Electronics Ltd, and Tencent Holdings Ltd. The key difference is IEMG’s broader reach and inclusion of smaller companies, which may appeal to those seeking more comprehensive market coverage.For more guidance on ETF investing, check out the full guide at this link.What this means for investorsFor investors seeking exposure to emerging markets stocks, iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) and the iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) are both emerging market exchange-traded funds (ETFs) worthy of consideration. Here’s how they matchup with each other.IEMG’s biggest edge is its expense ratio. IEMG has an expense ratio of only 0.09%, while its rival’s expense ratio is 0.72%. That means those who invest $10,000 in IEMG will pay $9 in fees per year, while those who invest $10,000 in EEM will pay $72 per year. What’s more, IEMG also boasts a higher dividend yield of 2.6%, while EEM has a dividend yield of 2.1%.For EEM, recent performance is its main edge. EEM has generated a one-year return of 26.2%, while its rival has generated 25.6%.In summary, most investors will favor IEMG, due to the lower fees and greater dividend yield. However, some investors may be swayed by EEM’s better recent performance.Read NextMar 26, 2026 •By Sarah SidlowEEM Offers Focused Growth While IXUS Provides Broad SafetyMar 26, 2026 •By Jake LerchEmerging Markets ETFs: EEM Boasts Higher Returns, SCHE Has Lower FeesMar 13, 2026 •By Keith NoonanBest International Stocks to Buy in 2026: Are They Right for Your Portfolio?Mar 26, 2026 •By Jeremy BowmanRecession Risks Are Rising According To Wall Street. Here's What It Means for Investors.Mar 26, 2026 •By Katie BrockmanIWO vs. VOOG: How Small-Cap Diversification Compares to Large-Cap GrowthAbout the AuthorJake Lerch is a contributing Motley Fool technology analyst covering artificial intelligence, cloud computing, cybersecurity, e-commerce, and semiconductors. Prior to The Motley Fool, Jake worked for 12 years at Credit Suisse, an international investment bank. He holds a bachelor’s degree in business with a concentration in economics from the University of North Carolina at Wilmington.TMFRescueDogStocks MentionediShares - iShares Msci Emerging Markets ETFNYSEMKT: EEM$55.47(-3.40%)-$1.95iShares - iShares Core Msci Emerging Markets ETFNYSEMKT: IEMG$68.16(-3.33%)-$2.35*Average returns of all recommendations since inception. Cost basis and return based on previous market day close.

Read Original

Source Information

Source: The Motley Fool

Discussion

0 professional contributions

Sign in to join this professional discussion.

Be the first to add a constructive contribution.