Back to News
investment

DOJ to appeal judge's decision to block Fed subpoenas in Powell criminal probe

CNBC
Loading...
4 min read
0 likes
⚡ Quantum Brief
A federal judge blocked grand jury subpoenas targeting Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell in a criminal probe, calling the investigation politically motivated to pressure Powell into resigning or cutting interest rates. The DOJ will appeal the ruling, which U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro deemed "outrageous," claiming it grants Powell immunity without legal basis. The judge found no evidence of wrongdoing beyond Powell resisting presidential demands. Sen. Thom Tillis vowed to block Powell’s successor, Kevin Warsh, until the probe ends, likely extending Powell’s term past May and delaying potential rate cuts sought by the White House. The investigation centers on Powell’s testimony about the Fed’s billion-dollar HQ renovation, but the judge ruled subpoenas were issued to harass, not uncover crimes. Markets now expect no rate cuts until late 2026, compounded by economic uncertainty from the Iran war, which has driven up energy costs and dampened easing prospects.
AI Audio Summary
0:00 / 0:00
Click to play
dcbb6659-0daf-4a2e-923f-3b6f2f91cf21.jpeg
Quantum News · Media Library

A federal judge in a scathing ruling blocked subpoenas issued by a grand jury to the Federal Reserve as part of a criminal investigation of Chair Jerome Powell. U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia Jeanine Pirro immediately said that the Department of Justice would appeal what she called the "outrageous" ruling, after it was unsealed Friday.Friday's action will likely keep Powell in the chairman's seat longer because Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., has vowed to block Kevin Warsh's confirmation to succeed Powell until the federal investigation ends.That may mean interest rates remain higher than President Donald Trump wants for longer because Powell has refused to bend to the president's demands to lower them further.Boasberg, in his ruling, said evidence showed Pirro was motivated to investigate Powell because of a desire to get the Fed chief to bow to Trump and cut interest rates quickly and broadly.Pirro's investigation purportedly is focused on the Fed's multi-billion-dollar renovation of its headquarters in Washington and on Powell's testimony to the Senate Banking Committee about that project."Did prosecutors issue those subpoenas for a proper purpose? The Court finds that they did not," Boasberg wrote in the decision in U.S. District Court in D.C., which was dated Wednesday, but unsealed on Friday."There is abundant evidence that the subpoenas' dominant (if not sole) purpose is to harass and pressure Powell either to yield to the President or to resign and make way for a Fed Chair who will," the judge wrote."On the other side of the scale, the Government has offered no evidence whatsoever that Powell committed any crime other than displeasing the President," Boasberg wrote.Pirro blasted Boasberg's ruling at a news conference Friday, calling it "outrageous.""Jerome Powell is now bathed in immunity," she fumed. "This is wrong, and it is without legal authority," Pirro said."This outrageous decision will be appealed by the Department of Justice," she said.Tillis, in a statement on the social media site X on Friday, said, "This ruling confirms just how weak and frivolous the criminal investigation of Chairman Powell is and it is nothing more than a failed attack on Fed independence.""We all know how this is going to end and the D.C. U.S. Attorney's Office should save itself further embarrassment," Tillis wrote.The Federal Reserve declined to comment when contacted by CNBC.Boasberg's ruling and the DOJ's planned appeal are likely to keep Powell in his seat as Fed chair until after his term expires in May.Tillis's promised "no" vote on the Banking Committee advancing Warsh's nomination would deadlock that panel, preventing Warsh from getting a confirmation vote by the full Senate.Trump's desire that the Fed slash interest rates further has been further complicated by the Iran war. Soaring energy costs are likely to dissuade policymakers from easing until there is more clarity about when and how the war will end.Recent statements from Fed officials have indicated a mostly cautious approach to further cuts, save from Governors Stephen Miran and Christopher Waller, who have favored lower rates.Markets already had pushed back any hopes for rate reductions until the end of the year. Before the war, the market had been pricing in at least two cuts.— CNBC's Eamon Javers and Jeff Cox contributed to this articleThis is breaking news. Please refresh for updates.Got a confidential news tip? We want to hear from you.Sign up for free newsletters and get more CNBC delivered to your inboxGet this delivered to your inbox, and more info about our products and services.© 2026 Versant Media, LLC.

All Rights Reserved. A Versant Media Company. Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes. Global Business and Financial News, Stock Quotes, and Market Data and Analysis. Data also provided by

Read Original

Source Information

Discussion

0 professional contributions

Sign in to join this professional discussion.

Be the first to add a constructive contribution.