Back to News
investment

Better Bond ETF: Fidelity's FIGB vs. iShares' IEI

newsfeedback@fool.com (Robert Izquierdo)
Loading...
4 min read
0 likes
⚡ Quantum Brief
Fidelity’s FIGB ETF charges a 0.36% expense ratio—over double iShares’ IEI at 0.15%—but delivers a higher 4.1% yield versus IEI’s 3.6%, appealing to income-focused investors. FIGB holds 180 diversified investment-grade bonds, including cash allocations, while IEI focuses solely on 83 intermediate-term Treasuries, offering narrower but safer exposure. Risk metrics favor IEI: its five-year max drawdown was -13.88% versus FIGB’s -18.06%, and its beta (0.69) indicates lower volatility than FIGB’s 1.02. Performance is nearly identical over five years ($1,025 vs. $1,026 growth per $1,000), but FIGB’s 5.9% one-year return outpaces IEI’s 4.3%. IEI’s $18.7B AUM dwarfs FIGB’s $450.9M, providing superior liquidity, while FIGB’s active management aims for outperformance but at higher cost.
AI Audio Summary
0:00 / 0:00
Click to play
Untitled design (22).png
Quantum News · Media Library

By Robert Izquierdo – Apr 12, 2026 at 8:32AM ESTKey PointsFidelity Investment Grade Bond ETF charges a higher expense ratio but delivers a modestly higher yield than iShares 3-7 Year Treasury Bond ETF.FIGB includes a broader mix of investment-grade bonds, resulting in slightly higher risk and a deeper historical drawdown.IEI focuses solely on intermediate Treasuries, while FIGB holds more securities and allocates significantly to cash and other high-grade sectors.The Fidelity Investment Grade Bond ETF (FIGB 0.09%) offers broader bond exposure and a higher yield than iShares 3-7 Year Treasury Bond ETF (IEI 0.08%), but comes with a higher fee, more volatility, and a deeper historical drawdown.Both funds target high-quality U.S. bonds, but IEI zeroes in on intermediate-term Treasuries, while FIGB takes a wider approach by including various investment-grade sectors and a notable cash allocation. This comparison looks at cost, returns, risk, and portfolio makeup to help investors weigh which ETF may better fit their needs.Snapshot (cost & size)MetricIEIFIGBIssuerISharesFidelityExpense ratio0.15%0.36%1-yr return (as of 2026-04-09)4.3%5.9%Dividend yield3.6%4.1%Beta0.691.02AUM$18.7 billion$450.9 millionBeta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from five-year monthly returns. The 1-yr return represents total return over the trailing 12 months.IEI is more affordable on fees, charging 0.15% annually, while FIGB costs 0.36%. FIGB compensates with a slightly higher yield, offering a 4.1% payout compared to IEI's 3.6%.Performance & risk comparisonMetricIEIFIGBMax drawdown (5 y)-13.88%-18.06%Growth of $1,000 over 5 years$1,025$1,026What's insideFIGB takes a diversified approach with 180 holdings spanning U.S. investment-grade bond sectors. Its largest positions include the Fidelity Cash Central Fund (11.94%), U.S. Treasury bonds 4.75% (3.95%), and U.S. Treasury notes 4.25% (3.87%). The fund has a 5.1-year track record, and there are no leverage, ESG, or currency hedging quirks noted.IEI, on the other hand, is strictly focused on intermediate U.S. Treasury bonds, with 83 holdings in U.S. Treasury Notes with various maturities. This pure-Treasury approach results in lower risk and less yield, but also less exposure to other bond sectors or cash. Neither fund tracks an explicit index or features notable structural twists.For more guidance on ETF investing, check out the full guide at this link.What this means for investorsIn comparing the Fidelity Investment Grade Bond ETF (FIGB) and iShares 3-7 Year Treasury Bond ETF (IEI), the choice comes down to whether you prioritize higher income and broader diversification or maximum safety and lower costs.FIGB is far more expensive with a 0.36% expense ratio, but it delivers a greater dividend yield, broader diversification thanks to its wider range of bonds, and a higher one-year return. It’s also an actively-managed fund aiming to outperform the broader investment-grade bond market, which contributes to its higher cost.IEI is passively-managed, but that keeps its cost lower than FIGB. Because it focuses on U.S. Treasuries, IEI delivers maximum safety with regards to capital preservation and volatility, as demonstrated by its lower beta. The fund also sports a far larger AUM of $18.7 billion, providing much greater level of liquidity.FIGB is for investors who seeks a higher income payout and is comfortable with more volatility and higher fees. IEI is for the conservative investor who prioritizes capital preservation, liquidity, and lower costs.Read NextApr 12, 2026 •By Robert IzquierdoChoosing an ETF for Bond Exposure: Fidelity's FIGB vs. Vanguard's VGITApr 11, 2026 •By Cory RenauerIGIB Offers Broader Bond Exposure Than FIGBMar 16, 2026 •By John BallardVCIT Offers Broader Diversification Than FIGBApr 12, 2026 •By David DierkingThe Best AI ETF to Invest $2,000 in Right NowApr 12, 2026 •By Reuben Gregg BrewerThe 3 Highest-Yielding Dividend Kings in AprilApr 12, 2026 •By Cory RenauerThe BSV ETF Offers Lower Costs and Larger Scale Than the ISTB ETFAbout the AuthorRobert "Izzy" Izquierdo is a contributing Motley Fool stock market analyst covering information technology, consumer discretionary, consumer staples, and communication services sectors. Prior to The Motley Fool, Izzy was head of product management at Target Media Partners, developing and launching multimillion-dollar software used by businesses such as Charter Communications. Prior to that, he worked at Yahoo! and startups on software products in connected TV, AI, consumer apps, and digital advertising. He holds a bachelor’s degree in English literature from UCLA and is certified in software product management.TMFWryWriteStocks MentionedFidelity Merrimack Street Trust - Fidelity Investment Grade Bond ETFNYSEMKT: FIGB$43.15(-0.09%)-$0.04iShares Trust - iShares 3-7 Year Treasury Bond ETFNASDAQ: IEI$118.42(-0.08%)-$0.09*Average returns of all recommendations since inception. Cost basis and return based on previous market day close.

Read Original

Source Information

Source: The Motley Fool

Discussion

0 professional contributions

Sign in to join this professional discussion.

Be the first to add a constructive contribution.